Thinking a mask is going to stop corona is like thinking your undies will stop a fart!

If there were dropplets in the farts, it would stop those dropplets

True, but there's no evidence that wearing a mask will protect against viruses and lots of evidence that wearing a mask is hazardous to one's health.

False.

1. There is no evidence that wearing a mask is hazardous to one's health
2. There are evidence about effectiveness of masks reducing infection rate

This article seems the most complete about it:

Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31142-9/fulltext

This article deals with mathematical models based on casuistry, mathematical models are not usually wrong:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468042720300117?via%3Dihub

This is a preprint study available since 10 May, offering a fairly reliable study
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202004.0203/v1/download

This is an study in the us based on the casuistry:
https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00818

This is an old article, July 2008, about the effectiveness of mask against influenza,a pretty interesting model to build on https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002618#s2

How about a study that wasn’t funded by the Rockefellers and Bill Gates’ World Hoax Organization? The article I posted cited numerous studies that demonstrate that the masks are useless and do cause harm. Regardless, there’s really no point in debating whether masks protect against a virus before first conclusively establishing/proving that a new pathogenic virus exists.

That’s right, despite all the hype and false assumptions, the fact is that this coronavirus (like all other viruses) has never been proven to be harmful, contagious, or even to exist. There is a 150-year-old scientific procedure (known as “Koch’s postulates”) that was designed to eliminate other variables in order to make such a determination but, to this day, they have neglected to do this. Before anyone can assert as a fact that a particular pathogen causes a particular disease, the pathogen must first be isolated and then placed into a healthy organism to see if that organism develops the same disease. They have never even done this very first step so, until they do, it’s just a conspiracy theory.

On top of that, neither the RT-PCR nor antibody tests are capable of detecting a virus, so there is not one singe confirmed case of COVID-19. This is all just a preplanned scheme to rob us of our most basic natural rights, destroy us economically, and institute their medical dictatorship, cashless society, and New World Order.

Mathematical models are not usually wrong? Here, read up about the doomsday computer models by Bill Gates’ employee Dr. Neil Ferguson that grossly exaggerated the danger and were used to justify this unprecedented and utterly disastrous global shutdown in the first place: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/05/04/professor-neil-ferguson-and-the-idiot-presidents/

If you take the time to do the research, I’m sure you’ll have no problem finding numerous studies demonstrating that facemasks pose serious health risks. However, feel free to wear a Hazmat suit if it makes you feel safer.

If you say these studies are funded by rockefeller and bill gates, ¿Can you prove it? ¿And why WHO would fund studies that says the opposite of what they are saying?

WHO said mask are not neccesary, or doesn't work if they aren't homologated, but they all work and are neccesary to low R0 of the virus under 1, without other measures like permanent quarantine.

So they does not funded studies showing that mask works. Because they say the opposite.

Bill Gates is funding vaccines, why would kill the virus, could not sell any vaccine if the disease dissapears?

The dead of this virus die from a cytokine storm that arises in response to this virus, once it floods the lungs, tested in autopsies. The virus is there, to deny that the virus has nothing to do with the disease at this point is to go into idiot mode.

Saying that PCR does not work for detect a virus is like "flat earthers" stuff. Think you are trolling. Can you read any info on internet that is not a extreme conspiracy theories site?

How reliable are mathematical models to predict infections diseases?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258835563_Mathematical_modelling_and_prediction_in_infectious_disease_epidemiology

"If I take time to do the research" you say, like I didin't, that's why I talking in first place. YOU didin't take time to do any research and believe in random hoaxes asociated to conspiracy theories.

There is no realiable study demostrating health risk of using facemask. Only theories. The evidence is just the opposite. Facemask are tools which are useful to filter particles in the air, like a virus, used long time on the history, specially on populated cities on Asian contriues, without any recorded case that it could be a health hazard, on the contrary, they protect from airborne particle contamination, the coronavirus travels in droplets of saliva large enough to be blocked by different masks. Reducing the viral load is essential to curb the epidemic and gain immunity at the same time.

https://www.vumc.org/coronavirus/latest-news-you-asked-we-answered/does-prolonged-wearing-facemask-cause-harm

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/frightening-doctor-debunks-claims-that-wearing-a-face-mask-is-more-harmful-than-covid-19-1.4986734

The bad side effects of wearing facemask that are "potential" (no demostrated), and were defended by the WHO for no suggestin using:
https://theconversation.com/four-potential-consequences-of-wearing-face-masks-we-need-to-be-wary-of-140273

You seem to misunderstand the first part of what I said so I’ll rephrase. History shows that after using their extreme wealth acquired by dominating the petrochemical and banking industries that they monopolized, the Rockefellers decided to take over the medical industry too. They corrupted the entire medical profession and created a medical hierarchy in order to maintain a monopoly to better sell their chemical-based pharmaceuticals. (Modern medicine is based on the false Germ Theory proposed by Louis Pasteur even though he recanted it on his deathbed.) Anyway, with their goal of world domination, they established the entire United Nations, even donating the land in NYC to house it. Newsflash: Some conspiracies are indeed real and this is one of the biggest ones so I encourage you to research it because the implications are far more serious than the question of whether masks help prevent the transmission of imaginary viruses.

So, the WHO would not exist without the Rockefellers and Bill Gates is now the number one contributor to the WHO and has donated over 2 billion dollars to it over the last couple of decades, which is why he has enormous control over the organization. The main mega-study published in the Lancet that you presented about the alleged importance of wearing masks was funded by the WHO—an organization I consider to be a medical terrorist organization currently run by a leader of the Tigrayan People's Liberation Front--another known terrorist organization listed in the Global Terrorism Database. This is why, as far as I’m concerned, their scientific recommendations lack any credibility. Unfortunately, whole countries around the world violated the basic human rights of their people by putting them under house arrest for many months, devastating them financially and destroying the world’s economy, all because of the recommendations of this World Hoax Organization.

There is abundant evidence that the diagnostic tests are not only useless but downright fraudulent. That’s why even pieces of fruit have tested positive for the coronavirus. In the following quote, Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel prize for inventing the PCR test, explains why the PCR is not especially diagnostic, for HIV or for anything else:

“Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron. PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”

What the PCR tests detect are fragments of our own DNA, not a virus. What they have identified as a virus are merely our own exosomes that protect our cells by packaging and discarding toxic elements along with fragments our own damaged DNA. For more information about this, I recommend this video by Dr. Kaufman:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TWLuo-8H98

In this 35-minute video, Dr. Kaufman elaborates on why there is no evidence of a new virus or that it causes disease:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvcEIarencM

Here’s another good article explaining why the testing methods are not only completely inadequate but unscientific:
http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf

So you think I didn't take time to do any research on the health risks of wearing masks? Even the corrupt World Health Organization states there “is no evidence wearing a mask by a healthy person in a community setting can prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19” and further concludes “universal community masking” is ineffective at preventing “infection from respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.” The WHO recommended against wearing medical masks as they “may create a false sense of security” against COVID-19, while it further went out of its way to reiterate that there is “no evidence available on a [mask’s] usefulness to protect non-sick persons.”
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331693/WHO-2019-nCov-IPC_Masks-2020.3-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Study on CDC website which reviewed ten different randomized clinical trials, world-wide, reviewing highly infectious respiratory virus transmission which found “no significant reduction” in “transmission with the use of face masks.” https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article.

British Medical Journal notes that cloth face masks may INCREASE spread of virus: “This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”:
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577

Explanation of Why Face Masks Do Not Work (reviewing other studies):
https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/face-masks-dont-work-revealing-review/

Canadian Physicist Reviewing Why Face Masks Do Not Work:
http://ocla.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Rancourt-Masks-dont-work-review-science-re-COVID19-policy.pdf

Wearing respirators come[s] with a host of physiological and psychological burdens. These can interfere with task performances and reduce work efficiency. These burdens can even be severe enough to cause life-threatening conditions if not ameliorated. Arthur Johnson, Journal of Biological Engineering (2016).

In a study conducted by the National Taiwan University Hospital fifteen years ago, it was found that the use of N-95 masks in healthcare workers caused them to experience hypoxemia, a low level of oxygen in the blood, and hypercapnia, an elevation in the blood’s carbon dioxide levels. Not only did the mask create dangerously low levels of oxygen and an equally dangerous spike in carbon dioxide in the human body, the study found that “medical staff are at increased risk of getting ‘Severe acute respiratory syndrome’ (SARS) [from] wearing N95 masks….” Lastly, the study’s authors further found that “dizziness, headache, and short[ness] of breath are commonly experienced by the medical staff wearing N95 masks” and that the “ability to make correct decisions” was also likely impaired. The Physiological Impact of N95 Masks on Medical Staff, National Taiwan University Hospital (June 2005).

Studies show that headaches in medical professionals are commonly found as a result of mask-wearing, which is a sign of hypoxia: Just under 10% of the healthcare workers in one study experienced such severe symptoms that they were forced to take, on average, two full days of sick leave from their healthcare jobs, while 60% of these healthcare professionals “required use of abortive analgesics because of headache.” Headaches and the N95 Face-Mask Amongst Healthcare Providers. Lim EC1, Seet RC, Lee KH, Wilder-Smith EP, Chuah BY, Ong BK, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 28 Feb 2006, 113(3):199-202.

A more recent study involving 159 healthcare workers aged 21 to 35 years of age found that 81% developed headaches from wearing a face mask – which is a sign of dangerously low levels of oxygenation – and ALL healthcare workers felt like the headaches affected their work performance. Ong JJY et al. Headaches associated with personal protective equipment- A cross-sectional study among frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19. Headache 2020;60(5):864-877.

In this study, researchers examined the blood oxygen levels in 53 surgeons. They measured blood oxygenation before surgery as well as at the end of surgeries. The researchers found that the mask reduced the blood oxygen levels significantly. The longer the duration of wearing the mask, the greater the fall in blood oxygen levels. Bader A et al. Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery. Neurocirugia 2008;19:12-126.

In a study of dentists and dental assistants who adopted new protocols since COVID, headaches jumped from 16% pre-COVID to 65%, with half of respondents (49%) noting it was hard to breathe “all the time” and 40% noting it was hard to breathe some of the time. https://www.dentistryiq.com/covid-19/article/14177630/headaches-exhaustion-anxiety-the-physical-and-emotional-challenges-of-returning-to-work-during-the-pandemic?utm_source=RDH%20eVillage%20%26%20Product&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CPS200611069&o_eid=3982E9300967G0X&rdx.ident[pull]=omeda%7C3982E9300967G0X&oly_enc_id=3982E9300967G0X&fbclid=IwAR1Dr974eARlmMqMikUxsl8XBZjvzOznYcgEFxJLWUoR-n1zjxfUxih_QKY#cid-14177681

“It is known that the N95 mask, if worn for hours, can reduce blood oxygenation as much as 20%” which in turn “can lead to a loss of consciousness, as happened to the hapless fellow driving around alone in his car wearing an N95 mask, causing him to pass out, and to crash his car and sustain injuries. I am sure that we have several cases of elderly individuals or any person with poor lung function passing out, hitting their head. This, of course, can lead to death.” Are Face Masks Effective Against Covid-19? The Science Times (May 25, 2020).

In a study of dentists and dental assistants who adopted new protocols since COVID, headaches jumped from 16% pre-COVID to 65%, with half of respondents (49%) noting it was hard to breathe “all the time” and 40% noting it was hard to breathe some of the time. https://www.dentistryiq.com/covid-19/article/14177630/headaches-exhaustion-anxiety-the-physical-and-emotional-challenges-of-returning-to-work-during-the-pandemic?utm_source=RDH%20eVillage%20%26%20Product&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CPS200611069&o_eid=3982E9300967G0X&rdx.ident[pull]=omeda%7C3982E9300967G0X&oly_enc_id=3982E9300967G0X&fbclid=IwAR1Dr974eARlmMqMikUxsl8XBZjvzOznYcgEFxJLWUoR-n1zjxfUxih_QKY#cid-14177681

“It is known that the N95 mask, if worn for hours, can reduce blood oxygenation as much as 20%” which in turn “can lead to a loss of consciousness, as happened to the hapless fellow driving around alone in his car wearing an N95 mask, causing him to pass out, and to crash his car and sustain injuries. I am sure that we have several cases of elderly individuals or any person with poor lung function passing out, hitting their head. This, of course, can lead to death.” Are Face Masks Effective Against Covid-19? The Science Times (May 25, 2020).

The immunity of the mask wearer – and his or her subsequent ability to fight off COVID-19 or any other harmful infection – is actually harmed by wearing a mask. The drop in oxygen levels (hypoxia) noted in many studies is directly associated with an impairment in immunity. In terms of the biological effects, what the studies have shown is that the lowered rate of oxygen (hypoxia) in turn inhibits the production of the type of primary immune cells that our bodies use to fight viral infections (known as the CD4+ T-lymphocyte). Functionally speaking, what happens inside our bodies is that the decrease in oxygen causes a spike in the level of a compound called hypoxia-inducible-factor-1 (HIF-1). Once that compound spikes, it in turn inhibits the production of T-lymphocytes we need for our bodies to fight off invaders and infections. Yet worse, the lack of oxygen stimulates a powerful inhibitor of the immune system (a cell called the Tregs), which in turn makes one’s body ripe for contracting a COVID-19 infection and experiencing said illness more severely: “This sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19, and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence, your mask may very well put you at an increased risk of infections and if so, having a much worse outcome.” Russell Blaylock, Id. (quoting Shehade H et al. Cutting edge: Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 negatively regulates Th1 function. J Immunol 2015;195:1372-1376. See also: Westendorf AM et al. Hypoxia enhances immunosuppression by inhibiting CD4+ effector T cell function and promoting Treg activity. Cell Physiol Biochem 2017;41:1271-84. See further: Sceneay J et al. Hypoxia-driven immunosuppression contributes to the pre-metastatic niche. Oncoimmunology 2013;2:1 e22355.

People with cancer may be at a further risk from hypoxia – as cancer cells grow best in a bodily environment that is low in oxygen. Low oxygen also promotes systemic inflammation which, in turn, promotes “the growth, invasion and spread of cancers.” Aggarwal BB. Nucler factor-kappaB: The enemy within. Cancer Cell 2004;6:203-208, and Blaylock RL. Immunoexcitatory mechanisms in glioma proliferation, invasion and occasional metastasis. Surg Neurol Inter 2013;4:15.

Repeated episodes of low oxygen – known as intermittent hypoxia – also “causes atherosclerosis” and hence increases “all cardiovascular events” such as heart attacks – as well as adverse cerebral events like stroke. Blaylock, quoting Savransky V et al. Chronic intermittent hypoxia induces atherosclerosis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2007;175:1290-1297.

Journal of the American Medical Association, April 17, 2020: "Masks and Coronavirus Disease": "Unless you are sick, a health care worker, or caring for someone who has COVID-19, medical masks (including surgical face masks and N95s) are not recommended."

Peggy Hall explains how the US. Department of Labor Occupational and Safety and Health Administration's guidelines clearly show cloth and surgical masks don't work to reduce transmission of COVID-19, and how they deplete the body of oxygen causing adverse health effects: https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/osha-says-masks-dont-work-and-violate-osha-oxygen-levels2?utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%3A%20OSHA%20SAYS%20MASKS%20DON%27T%20WORK%20--%20AND%20Violate%20OSHA%20Oxygen%20Levels%20(RuZ25q)&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&_ke=eyJrbF9lbWFpbCI6ICJ0ZXJyeXRpbGxhYXJ0QGdtYWlsLmNvbSIsICJrbF9jb21wYW55X2lkIjogIksydlhBeSJ9

Pleurisy, also known as pleuritis, is inflammation of the membranes that surround the lungs and line the chest cavity (pleurae). This can result in a sharp chest pain while breathing. This can be caused by prolonged mask wearing! But imagine what doctors would assume if you reported that symptom today! No doubt you would be diagnosed with COVID-19 and told to quarantine... with a mask, or even worse... placed into a medically induced coma and on a ventilator, then locked in a room with no visitors allowed!

Peggy Hall references OSHA regulations that require a workplace to provide Oxygen levels of at least 19.5%. Wearing masks can cause Oxygen levels to drop below 19.5% so employees may suffer irreversible brain damage. An employer that requires prolonged mask wearing would be committing an OSHA violation, punishable by a significant fine or loss of business license.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewaecn8mVHQ&app=desktop

Facemask Exemptions: Facemask Science - Dr Tim O'Shea. Science or mass psychosis? Can't be both. On reviewing the actual science behind facemasks, we discover there is no evidence whatsoever that they protect against any infectious disease: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StrBjHK7qeg

Dr. Blaylock on dangers of masks:
https://www.ini-world-report.org/2020/05/13/dr-blaylock-robotic-mask-wearers-infect-themselves/

Dr. Andrew Kaufman on masks:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88qQsWM--3Q

More antimask fake news for idiots. Use your brain, your eyes, check all the info.

I could go on but I don't know why I've bothered investing so much time in trying to prove something to a complete stranger on the internet as it is. I have many things to do so I can't continue investing so much time trying to educate you. Please consider what I've already said and start questioning the official narrative because we are being lied to and the goal of the Rockefellers & Bill Gates is to profit while drastically reducing the population and you are falling for it with your blind faith because you don't believe in conspiracies.

One more thing that really needs to be pointed out is that, as the following study demonstrated, asymptomatic carriers don’t transmit the “virus”:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32513410/

Even Maria Van Kerkhove (the World Health Organization’s technical lead of COVID-19 response) says the spread of COVID-19 by asymptomatic people appears to be “very rare”:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/coronavirus-asymptomatic-spread-covid-19-world-health-organisation-dr-maria-van-kerkhove-a9555456.html

So, if asymptomatic people rarely (if ever) spread COVID-19 even without a mask, the obvious question we should all be asking ourselves is: WHY SHOULD HEALTHY OR ASYMPTOMATIC PEOPLE WEAR MASKS???

All to protect against a theoretical virus that has never been proven to exist, but allegedly only kills a quarter of 1% of those that get it (mostly elderly people with pre-existing conditions), and only about 1/10th of 1% of the world’s population have allegedly gotten it. There is no pandemic and wearing a mask will only lead to respiratory and other problems, which will inevitably be blamed on the virus too. People really need to start thinking critically and stop trusting their governments and corporate media, both with a long history of spewing lies and propaganda.

Fake news already debunked before

The fact is that massive use of facemask did worked. Cloth mask are washable.

Who didn't recommend massive usage of facemask, so it provoked the infections on West nations.

Flat earther theories

You can cry fake news and believe all the unproven pseudoscientific nonsense you like but if you are so concerned about contracting this imaginary virus with a 99.76% survival rate of those who contract it, you should wear a Hazmat suit like virologists use because a cheap disposable mask won’t offer much protection against a nano-sized virus that can enter your body not just through your nose and mouth but through your eyes and maybe even your skin...

The virus flies inside micro saliva droplets that can be blocked by many types of face mask and is helped by other measures like social distance.

Check this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgoTMOgb3Ds
and this article with two videos:
https://news.illinois.edu/view/6367/808377

They are very enlightening

The social distance has to do with the path at which these particles can leave and fall. They can go very far.

With homemade double cotton cloth masks, up to 95% of viral load expelled to the outside is blocked. It is enough to lower the virality and virus contagion rate below 1.

But everyone, at least up to 80%, must cover their faces in public places, especially due to the nature of infections by asymptomatic or presymptomatic.

This image explains how facemask work very well:
42ba5e.jpg (click to show)

The measure is more effective if people wear n95-approved or similar (ffp2 or kn95) unfiltered face masks that protect both ways. 3-5$ each one.

They can be reused, I advise rotating between 2 masks and not washing them, leaving them to dry in the open air, or using appropriate disinfection methods, found online, oven 70º 30 minutes (already used in hospitals) or microwave and glass of water (as long as the mask is metal-free)

Even if some viruses reach you taking general precautions, the amount would be negligible, the viral load is essential with this virus, if you develop the disease from a low viral load infection, it is most likely mild or asymptomatic. There is also less chance of infection if the viral load is low. That a virus reaches your body does not imply infection.

About universal facemask efficiency (posted before), but still important: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468042720300117

About asyntomathic transmission:
https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/07/02/2008373117
https://www.hiqa.ie/sites/default/files/2020-04/Evidence-summary-for-asymptomatic-transmission-of-COVID-19.pdf

Thanks for the links but I’ve already given you lots of studies showing that wearing masks doesn’t protect against viruses and only causes health problems. I see no point in continuing to debate about whether a mask will help against a virus that has never even been proven to exist. First prove a deadly virus exists and then we can discuss whether a mask will help. A virus is measured in nanometers—orders of magnitude smaller than the fibers of a mask. Considering how small "viruses" are reported to be, theoretically (like their existence), they should have no problem going right through the pores of your skin and could potentially remain airborne and be inhaled right through your mask. Ultimately, it’s not a mask but your immune system that keeps you healthy. And even if masks did statistically make a miniscule difference (even though there is no hard evidence for that), there is the still the issue of quality of life. For me, wearing a mask that makes me itch, impedes my ability to breathe, and destroys my quality of life is not worth the risk of harming my immune system because I have faith in my immune system. If you feel differently and think that humans were meant to walk around wearing masks and eye protection and rubber suits and live in plastic bubbles, then feel free to do whatever makes you feel safe, whether there is any real evidence or not that it will help protect you or is merely a placebo.

And, by the way, the flu isn’t contagious either. Experiments conducted over 100 years ago failed to spread the flu "virus" no matter how hard they tried... https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/221687?fbclid=IwAR19Ngq34COWhSkrg4O8_-fYK3xMrLqG4zbimvsWiWqipmdWiK5JInfmYmM

''The experiment began with 100 volunteers from the Navy who had no history of influenza. Rosenau was the first to report on the experiments conducted at Gallops Island in November and December 1918.69 His first volunteers received first one strain and then several strains of Pfeiffer's bacillus by spray and swab into their noses and throats and then into their eyes. When that procedure failed to produce disease, others were inoculated with mixtures of other organisms isolated from the throats and noses of influenza patients. Next, some volunteers received injections of blood from influenza patients. Finally, 13 of the volunteers were taken into an influenza ward and exposed to 10 influenza patients each. Each volunteer was to shake hands with each patient, to talk with him at close range, and to permit him to cough directly into his face. None of the volunteers in these experiments developed influenza. Rosenau was clearly puzzled, and he cautioned against drawing conclusions from negative results. He ended his article in JAMA with a telling acknowledgement: “We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”69 (p. 313)''
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/?fbclid=IwAR2RmgQMXotaQP8wyV2XVSljeD5ExvSONKKBt0nuRfdffFXqWQRSjMNKrf8

Haemophilus influenzae is a bacteria not a virus, obviously it does not infect anyone of influenza.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haemophilus_influenzae

From the Wikipedia article you posted: "The bacterium was argued by some to be the cause of influenza until 1933, when the VIRAL nature of influenza was firmly established, and infections are still colloquially known as bacterial influenza."

Exactly. Influenza is viric, that's why that old study didint worked, they though that was a bacteria, but it doesn't.

Actually, the study worked just fine. It showed that the flu “virus” isn’t contagious, therefore, until it is proven via the scientific method, there’s no reason to assume that the “coronavirus” is transmissible either, but you will anyway...

The study showed that influenza is not cause by a bacteria. Something well known since a century.

Ah, now I understand what you were trying to say but you seem to have missed the entire point of the study. Other than the very first step that involved the Pfeiffer’s bacillus, the rest of the study involved everything from shaking hands to coughing directly into people’s faces to injecting the snot and blood of influenza patients into healthy people but, no matter how hard they tried, they could not transmit this so-called infectious “virus” to anyone thus demonstrating that the flu “virus” is NOT contagious, contrary to all their expectations. I would add that the flu virus (like the coronavirus) has never been proven to exist and I am sure that if a similar study were to be done with COVID-19 patients, the outcome would be the same because as the famous virologist Stefan Lanka pointed out, viruses have never been proven to exist much less be contagious. What they call the “flu” is just a normal function of the body to detoxify itself.

Ah, now I understand what you were trying to say but you seem to have missed the entire point of the study. Other than the very first step that involved the Pfeiffer’s bacillus, the rest of the study involved everything from shaking hands to coughing directly into people’s faces to injecting the snot and blood of influenza patients into healthy people but, no matter how hard they tried, they could not transmit this so-called infectious “virus” to anyone thus demonstrating that the flu “virus” is NOT contagious, contrary to all their expectations. I would add that the flu virus (like the coronavirus) has never been proven to exist and I am sure that if a similar study were to be done with COVID-19 patients, the outcome would be the same because as the famous virologist Stefan Lanka pointed out, viruses have never been proven to exist much less be contagious. What they call the “flu” is just a normal function of the body to detoxify itself.

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy