That's a lot of rage to cover you lie and to obscure what I was saying. If you stop making things up to refute rather than what I say, maybe you'd be able to make a salient point rather than blathering nonsense.
1 increasing to 2 is a 100% increase. 100 increasing to 150 is a 50% increase.
But, the second example has a gain of 50 times the first, rather than the first have 2 times as much gain.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Still too stupid to realize you are using the wrong math.
Even if correct number it is the wrong way to compare and analyze investment performance.
LOL, justify your lies any way you wish, it is not what you keep measuring when you talk about stock, but thanks for admitting you measure wrong and therefore cannot maths.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
You are a hopeless retard
You probably think a 50% gain followed by a 50% loss is break even
It's not my fault you cannot understand simple percents based on different base numbers doesn't give you the whole answer..
1 increasing to 2 is a 100% increase. 100 increasing to 150 is a 50% increase.
But, the second example has a gain of 49 times the first, rather than the first have 2 times as much gain.
Hint, I didn't say 200 anywhere, liar. You cannot maths and thus must manufacturer an error that doesn't exist so you can hyperfocus on your own creation instead of thinking about the error in reasoning that you use.
1 < 49. Try to dance around it, but you saying the gain if the lesser amount is more. And 50% to 100% is twice as much of a percent gain. So you cannot maths as usual and dropped the gain to lie about my numbers rather than deal with your own faults.
Caption this Meme
