Trump Impeach

Deleted??? Maybe You Got Proved Wrong...

This Is About Trump Withholding Aide To Ukraine To Get Them To Investigate The Bidens Further!!!

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/22/us/trump-impeachment-ukraine.html?fbclid=IwAR33d7CEDCzWiPESIFFbZgGZHaoWI4ga5ktygRu1r9Lq4s9Lr-WxPRpgd0A

NO he didn't

Haldeman – White House chief of staff, considered the second most powerful man in the government during Nixon's first term; faced a maximum of 25 years in prison and $16,000 in fines; in 1975, he was convicted of conspiracy and obstruction of justice and received an 18-month prison sentence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._R._Haldeman

Trump's chief of staff did not admit to a quid pro quo. That's democrat's low IQ interpretation telling you that.

Yes, Yes He Did. Then Later Claimed He Didn't Say What He Did "LIVE ON TV" After He Got His Ass Jumped For Doing It...

https://youtu.be/LKRjDdIGWU4?t=202

No. No he didn't. Name the law which was broke. You can't. That video isn't what you say it is.

Furthermore, 1st: The favor he asked was to look into the DNC and Hillary Campaigns pressuring for dirt on Trump ahead of the 2016 campaign, and also if Crowdstrike has the server that the FBI never looked at. That is an ongoing investigation. Not a crime to ask them for help. 2nd: Trump and the Ukrainian president were in agreement about Burisma and the illegal Quid Pro Quo that Joe Biden did to get the prosecutor fired, and in fact, Ukraine had already reopened the investigation.Ukrainian president was quite aware of the issue and said so, and assured Trump that he has a new prosecutor. Again - no quid pro quo,

Seriously - Try actually reading the transcript instead of what the dems are making up, Adam Schiff made up version of the conversation should be investigated as a crime. He completely made up an imaginary conversation.

Did You Watch The Video??? He Said It And Then Answered The Question That Is Was A "Quid Pro Quo" And Said They Do It All The Time!!! They Do It All The Time, But They Don't Do It By Withholding Aid Sanctioned Legally By Congress To Be Given To Them!!! That Is Plain Extortion!!!

Yes I watched the video, but he did not say what you think he said. Did you actually read the transcript? Try reading what he actually said instead of what people are saying he said, and get back to me and tell me what law he broke. You can't. All you can do is regurgitate what the MSM are telling you to regurgitate.

The Script Isn't Even Right, There Are Now Witnesses Testifying Who Listened In...

Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told members of Congress that he tried to edit a White House log of a July call between President Donald Trump and Ukraine's president to include details that were omitted, one lawmaker present at the testimony and another source familiar with it confirmed to NBC News.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/30/alexander-vindman-tells-congress-he-tried-to-add-edits-to-white-house-memo-about-trump-ukraine-call.html

Vandman hasn't added one factual thing that we don't already know from the actual transcript. The only thing Vandman added was his own opinion difference from ALL THE OTHER PEOPLE IN THE ROOM who listed, and recorded the transcript. Furthermore, it has come out that Vandman was instructed to not share this with people not in the room, and he did share it with the whistleblower. Dude may have broken the law. And look what happened when Jim Jordan asked Vandman who he shared it with? CROOKED Adam Schiff instructed him not to answer because he wanted to protect the whistleblower's identity even though everyone knows it's Eric Ciaramella.

Vandman's testimony will be meaningless when the republicans dig into his shady past.

On September 25, the White House released what it called a “full, unredacted transcript” of US president Donald Trump’s phone call with president Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. In the fine print, though, it specifies that it’s “not a verbatim transcript of a discussion.” News outlets struggled to figure out what to call it, with the New York Times calling it a “reconstructed transcript” and the Washington Post saying “rough transcript.” Before long, #NotATranscript was trending on Twitter, as people recognized something fundamentally misleading in calling a document a “transcript” if it was not a verbatim record of what was said. But what’s behind this, and why does it matter?

https://qz.com/1717869/why-its-wrong-to-call-the-white-house-ukraine-memo-a-transcript/

Fact is, lefty idiots accuse Trump of anything from being Hitler, to being Putin's puppet (in spite the fact he's been harder on Putin than Obama ever was), to being crazy (even though the country is doing the best it has done in over 30 years), to "He's gonna start WW3" to "He should have kept those 50 soldiers to fight Turkey".

There is no end to the crazy left's TDS. The fact that you cave into the MSM obsession and think CNN is the best, simply tells me you are snowflake deranged when it comes to Trump.

"even though the country is doing the best it has done in over 30 years"

Yes & About 80% Of That Is Due To Obama!!!

Trump Isn't Doing As Good As Obama Did!!! And We Know How Bad Trump Claimed Obama Was Doing...

The Numbers Don't Lie!!! And Just Because The Guy In The Lead Has The Baton Now Doesn't Mean He Is The Reason Anyone Is Winning...

Tim Morrison, the top Russia and Europe adviser on the National Security Council, also told House impeachment investigators that he was advised by then-White House official Fiona Hill to stay away from the parallel Ukraine policy being pursued by Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, according to one of the sources.
Morrison said in his closed-door testimony that he was concerned the July 25 call transcript between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky would leak and could have negative ramifications, according to multiple sources and a copy of his opening statement obtained by CNN. But he also made the point that he saw nothing wrong with the July call.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/31/politics/tim-morrison-deposition-house-impeachment-inquiry/index.html

Hearsay and opinions. When you get some actual facts, let us know.

tRUMP is the best con and criminal to come along in ages!! his private life and record is the only proof 1 needs but this continuing assault on norms and truth is just a bonus for revealing his character

The Man Testified What He Was Told And Heard And Seen... That Is NOT Hearsay!!!