Hide the Pain Harold

The first study linking autism to vaccines in 1998, was by Andrew Wakefield and eleven other authors, who helped with it. Unsurprisingly, many people, including private researches with ZERO links to the government (Who made little money off of vaccines in the first place and; therefore, had no reason to lie in the first place) found no links between autism and vaccinating people. Later, Wakefield was caught lying about his methods and abusing kids for the purpose of proving his theory. As a result, he got his medical license taken away, so there's that.

The private researchers who weren’t paid by the government were probably just very pro-vaccine people who were motivated by their beliefs.

It’s very likely that it’s actually the government that took away Andrew Wakefield’s medical license. Why wouldn’t it? Besides, many other studies have proven the same. There seems to be enough anti-vaccine parents for all of them to be onto something.

The private researchers who weren’t paid by the government were believing what they did because unlike, Wakefield, they used actual reason and evidence to come to a conclusion about vaccines.

Now because very little science is centralized by the state (Thank god) how could private scientific organizations be used by the government who, again, makes very little from vaccines, arrest Wakefield who lost his license do to poor and immoral conduct? Also just because lots people think something is true it doesn't always mean it is.

The government obviously doesn’t want Wakefield to make everyone healthy.

But most antivaccine parents have good reasons to believe that vaccines cause autism, often due to experience.

Everything you just wrote is based on the idea that vaccines cause autism in the first place, but you're still yet to prove that.