I did not write this but it may be of some help to you " Why is the truth of a right action that one thinks is "bad" so difficult for humans to comprehend? To some people, incest may be "bad", watching videos of rapes & murders may be "bad", buying known stolen property may be "bad", etc etc may be "bad", but that some people that think that still has no right to use coercion(this includes complicity like begging & paying a third party to do the coercion) to prevent other people from doing those "bad" behaviors. Right and "good" are NOT synonomous folks. One is objective truth(right) and the other is a subjective opinion("good"). What you think is "good" has ZERO bearing of it being right or wrong. Preventing people from performing what you think is "bad", but that is actually also a right to do since no form of theft occurs which is a requirement for causation of harm to occur, then makes YOU the transgressor and thief of someone's free will/freedom to perform that victimless action....... Please try to learn #naturallaw and #selfownership as without knowledge of them, then makes you a Moral Relativist. That means exemptions of wrongdoing/theft are being "granted" by you. You are literally excusing/"justifying" both theft & causation of harm to another when you are a Moral Relativist. Humans don't get to decide, they can ONLY discover. Oh you can still have your own set of personal preferences/ethics, but to impose(using coercion) it onto others is theft of free will/freedom, which is causing harm to the victims of the theft/coercion."
Caption this Meme
