Am I The Only One Around Here

UM, yeah actually that is the reason because our founding fathers just got out of the tyrannical government and if you listen to their actual words and their quotes they have said over and over again that the reason they put in the Second Amendment in there specifically was to protect people from tyranny. That's why it says the right of the PEOPLE to Keep and bear Brms shall not be infringed, a well-regulated militia being necessary for the security of a Free state. It's also the reason we have civilian contractors. It's also the reason why the government gave special permissions for ordinary citizens to go after criminals, pirates, and other ruffians. That's why we have Letters of Marque and Reprisal. ...and it's also why the government passed legislation to make sure that the husbands, and the populace were actually all armed while traveling to and from certain destinations, in case of invasion. It was designed to protect from of enemies foreign and domestic. And besides this I can cite more examples where our founding fathers made it clear exactly what the Second Amendment was for. You really don't want to argue with me.

No it says the right of the individual people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, because in a moment's notice, when/if the government takes over and becomes tyrannical, or if we have an invasion, we need to be able to assist the regular army as a well regulated militia, and we should still have a militia today because we should not entrust the any government to not become tyrannical. The militia is defined as the People's Army and is totally necessary for the security of a free state. Your argument is VERY stupid because you're saying that, well it's in the Second Amendment, but we no longer need it today, so therefore we shouldn't follow the Second Amendment. Historically the militia has always existed separate from our military and separate from a police force and was designed to retaliate against a tyrannical government, and to assist the military in case of invasion. That's why the founding fathers made it clear that the right of the people to keep and bear arms is necessary for security of a free state. This is how our founding fathers understood and interpreted the Second Amendment and this is the way that it has always been consistently interpreted up until like the last 50 years when the stupid hippie regresses came along.

If you don't believe me you can look up several quotes from our founding fathers on the gun issue, and many of them said that EVERY citizen should be armed. They just came out of a tyrannical government. Do you honestly believe that they would chance their new-found system to the hands of another tyrannical government?

This is how the Second Amendment would be read today: A militia, or a well regulated people's army, is necessary for the security of a free nation, so therefore the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be tampered with.

JFK was a decent conservative Democrat, but no, they didn't actually do all those things. For example, they actually founded the KKK and increased segregation in the South had supported Jim Crow. They still support KKK members like Margaret Sanger and Richard Byrd even today.

Yes they are same party today. smh. how about the wig party? the know nothings? yes todays kkk would vote for Obama. ggom

The good thing is your breed is dying off. Can not stop progress, try as you may.

And you're meme is totally irrelevant. If you don't like the Second Amendment you should fight to change it, you don't get to dictate what it says because you don't like it.