Don’t mess with the “Favoured Races”

And how is evolution racist?

The original title of Darwin’s book is- Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

A species isn't a race.

Notice the title says “favoured races”^ Hmmm, I wonder what race he considers “favoured”? Hmmmm.....

Darwin states that humans are the only race of humans.

Interesting. Then why did he choose the term “favored race” in the title? Clearly that indicates there are lesser races...

In nature only the strongest would survive, but The book "Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life" is referring to that fact.

Too bad that isn’t true with the human race. Otherwise I might be inclined to believe in evolution. We tend to feel compassion for, and go out of our way to help the sick, weak, handicapped and elderly. Not leave them behind in our struggle to advance and evolve. “Survival of the fittest” mentality gives birth to ideals such as Hitler had in trying to create the perfect race of humans. Of course that, the second law of thermodynamics, and irreducible complexity, pretty much destroys the theory of evolution as a credible hypothesis.

How would you measure disorder on a earthly level? Entropy is a lot easier to measure with it's Joules/Kelvin. Now any medium of energy can be used make an attempt to pass energy over with less than 100% efficiency, but it still let's that energy go into the air. This similar to when a animal takes energy into it's self. The battery could evolve in any way it wants as long as it's giving up energy.

Good point. That would help with explaining away entropy. But how do you explain away irreducible complexity? Darwin himself said something like that would destroy his theory. He didn’t know then the complexity of the human cell....

We have found Protozoa which are believed to be one of the first steps in multicellular life.

The same thing the atom is for. But without the proton, neutron, and electron all working together at once, you have nothing. A proton does not evolve into a neutron, or vice-versa. So a Protozoa might be a key ingredient, but there is no proof that it evolves into the other parts that make up the cell. Without all the pieces of the puzzle, whatever is missing must be assumed, or “believed”. You are deceiving yourself if you think evolution is a fact and not a belief.

A Protozoa is a living organism, not a center of the Nucleus. I'm guessing when you say "Without all the pieces of the puzzle, whatever is missing must be assumed, or “believed". You are deceiving yourself if you think evolution is a fact and not a belief." I'm guessing you are referring to the term "missing link" the only missing links are ones that would alter smaller things like certain branches of evolution. Will do still have certain animals that don't have any missing links involving the evolution of them.

In response to your last comment, the key word you used was “believed”.. : )

What would you consider the Protozoa to be for then?