LAWS ON FAITH

:D

If you are right then you can easily enough explain how "religious dogme" is an oxymoron. :D

dogma* grr me typo much. Though... one cd say dog(ging) me instead proves nothing. Lol

spirituality has no foundation in reality, creating rules that seek to govern spirituality is equivalent to policing thought crime, and that is illogical

I disagree about spirituality having no foundation in reality but for the sake of argument let's say you are correct in saying so. That would make religious dogma wrong but how would that make it oxymoronic? Where is the contradiction like "square circle"?

oxymoron, to expose a paradox, policing thought crime, a paradox, religious laws(doctrine) is a paradox(oxymoron)...Why is this so hard to understand?

I give up. :D

Let me put it another way, this is the right way to use your imagination:___________.

I give up means...wait for it...I. Give. Up. :D

laws/rules/doctrine must have a place in reality to justify enforcement, the contradiction is laws/rules/doctrine is based on reality, faith/spirituality/religion is not

That makes them unjustified, false, untue not oxymoronic. Why did you not post the definition of oxymoron?

reality(square), imagination(circle)

doctrine(reality), religion(imagination)

ok I will humor u, laws on faith is a paradoxical

How so? :D

Bottom line: "religious dogma" is an oxymoron. :D

spirituality has no foundation in reality, creating rules that seek to govern spirituality is equivalent to policing thought crime, and that is illogical

dogma: a doctrine or body of doctrines concerning faith or morals formally stated and authoritatively proclaimed by a church