Sad and disgusting

I guess they've already interviewed one of his ex-wives, but I'm curious how many women from his past relationships that failed will be interviewed. One doesn't accumulate that much fire power without SOMEBODY noticing it, especially if they're living with him.

I figure the banning of things is about to start.. 1st bump stocks and high capacity magazines... Then ban all assault rifles..Then stockpiling ammo will be illegal... And of course the liberal dem will never stop there... To me it really doesn't matter with the 5g rollout which operates in millimeter wavelengths (microwave frequency the military is weaponizing) isn't there a verse in the bible about men's flesh burning while still standing... The gun debate is just a distraction

I don't think that will be a problem. According to a Fox News Analyst I saw last night, the LIberals are the ones stock piling the weaponry. They are the domestic terrorists because they have had enough. If that's true, then conservatives best run for cover.

Being born and raised around firearms, facing off with a whiny ass snowflake doesn't concern me to much lol... In all seriousness tho things are so polarized that one side must win out over the other... The hive mind or the right to be a individual

Currently, the Hive mind is active on both ends of the spectrum: How many attempts has one side of the political spectrum, that have had years to come up with a better solution, attempted to repeal the ACA? How many people supported the "Keep the status quo" last year when they voted for Hillary?My friends and relatives no longer send me political e-mails because I always research the claims and blow that shit away. Ask yourself how you reacted to the last political e-mail you received. Did you just hit forward to your list of contacts, like the hive minded people, or did you research it further?

I research... Media is mind control... If you never heard of it, tavistock is something to look into

Looks like an interesting source. A decent starting point for research. I also like the TED talks. Again, a good start. The general media is limited because of the amount of bias that has led to the polarization you spoke of. I don't limit my research to a single article. One reason why I don't get into to many political sites anymore. I was the chief writer on one page until the owner decided to roll over when Hillary got the nomination. He's still banging that drum. Conservative Democrat. Party motivated. I was asked to do a progressive page, but the guy in charge only wanted to pass on other "progressive" opinions, usually a video. Wouldn't even bother putting a commentary on the videos he shared. Looking for the easiest way to get a story out. I turned down doing the Newslo thing because their "parodies" were anything but. They were definitely fake news and prided themselves in it. I've been burned by those sources that put parody as news and won't identify it. Back when it first started, I commented on the sample story they presented. It read as straight fact, but when I checked the "facts" I chewed him out. His comment was, "it's parody." But it wasn't. Not the way it was presented. It was written so the typical political moron would accept it as fact and forward the story on without thinking.