Little Acknowledged Fact Crab

How? I have private property and I used no force.

Join me in a little thought experiment. You are in possession of some property. I come to you and demand that you give it to me. Without using force or asking someone else to use force, escape the situation with your property.

Ah! That is the moral dilemma of maintaining private property, only in response to your attempt to violate it. My meme referred to the unwarranted spread of communism, which violates my rights to private property by seizure. If I had gained this private properly morally, and you attempt to seize it immorally, I reserve the right to use force. If you violate my right to property, I may violate your right to life.

The point of my memes is that communism can only be spread through force, as if one denies the government their liberty and property, to attain this, commie governments will execute me and seize my property.

There will be no force involved in my private property unless you violate it.

So it sounds as though force isn't the problem for you, only its unjustified use.

I suppose the proponents of communism would say that such force is justified to remedy injustice against the worker. How would you respond to that?

Correct. Force is not an issue if it's retaliatory.

I would need to see where that worker's rights have been violated, and punish the individual who did so individually. I'd also need them to justify liquidation of currency and seizure of ALL private property, including the workers. Injustice do s not compensate for injustice.

A decent answer.

That counts for something :)