Trump actually asked "If we have nuclear weapons, why can't we use them?"

Maybe he was looking for a straight answer and the advisor wouldn't give him one. However, in his speeches, Trump is consistently against starting wars. He wants to end the War on Terror, make friends with Russia, get U.S. troops out of Europe, and focus the military on defense of the U.S. rather than foreign wars for the globalists.

So, you don't support Hillary threatening Iran?
But you support Trump's idea of "Ending the War on Terror'? What do you suppose such a statement includes? Starting book clubs? ISIS and the Taliban are backed by and sponsored by Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Your info is wrong. First of all, the "Taliban" aren't really "terrorists". They are a political party that ruled Afghanistan for years. In 2001, they had successfully eradicated the opium trade in the area and replaced the poppy fields with food--then the U.S. attacked. ISIS is backed by the U.S., Saudi Arabia, and a few other G20 countries. How do you think they got all those brand-new Toyota trucks? Who do you think is buying their stolen oil? Iran is fighting ISIS in the Middle East because ISIS is a threat to Iran--Iran is Shia, ISIS is Sunni.

Ending the War on Terror is easier than you'd think. The U.S. created the WOT in order to gain control of the Middle East. It was planned in the 1990s: imgflip.com/i/18kixs

"Ending the War on Terror is easier than you'd think."
Well, it's far from under control now, so how is it done so easily?

The first thing we need to do is stop funding them. Al Qaeda is a CIA creation from the 1980s. We're still funding them today although they've changed their name a couple of times (al Nusra, et.al.). Most times through Saudi Arabia and sometimes through Libya. Google "U.S. created al Qaeda" and you'll get a lesson in the War on Terror: 101

Where do you think ISIS got those brand new Toyota Trucks?

I know about how the CIA trained and supplied the Mujahideen in the Afghan war.
I also know that the US is funding ISIS indirectly through Saudi Arabia and friends, but I find it hard to believe that the US is funding ISIS directly. But any proof of that would be interesting.

Anyway, I see no reason for Trump to stop making deals with Saudi Arabia.

The "U.S." isn't funding directly but people with power inside the government are funding them. The Clinton Foundation has connections: imgflip.com/i/18l7or
McCain was sent to support the Muslim Brotherhood: imgflip.com/i/18coot
Clinton also has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood: imgflip.com/i/1811v6
And, the Muslim Brotherhood helps support ISIS.

Have a read here. Apart from the debt itself, the other info is interesting.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-650-million-debt-limited-liability-companies-minority-stake-finance-business-property-a7201296.html

"His critics said" is not really a valid source for an article. However, apart from that, the entire western monetary system is kept afloat by debt. The dollar, itself, is nothing but an IOU to the international bankers. The amount of debt carried by a person is what makes him valuable (your credit score). All large businesses use LLCs and such. This puts debts, mortgages, and the like into bundles where accountants and bankers can keep an eye on them, trade them, bet against or for them, and make billions on the stock market. Yes, it's a financial casino but that's how our system works and has worked for a long time.

You forgot the Bush family.
I don't like the Clinton family's businesses. Hillary is simply the less horrible option at this point.

But, none of this changes the fact that Trump is a demagogue - "a a person, especially an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people."

He whips up fear and hate, he describes everything outside of the US borders as a threat, as well as several elements inside the borders, he wants to build walls. It's history repeating itself, and not in a good way.

Your not making a lot of sense here.

The original meaning of a demagogue is irrelevant, I gave the intended definition to be clear of what I meant.

You seem to be saying it's okay that Trump is a demagogue, because Hillary is one too?

You're very good at rationalizing Trump's statements. But are you sure there no hate, racism or fear mongering from Trump?

"When mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re sending people that have lots of problems. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists."
(And to defend that statement)
"Who's doing the raping? Somebody's doing the raping."

"According to Bill O'Reilly, 80% of all the shootings in New York City are blacks-if you add Hispanics, that figure goes to 98%. 1% white."

“Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are little short guys that wear yarmulkes every day.”

"And the other thing is with the terrorists, you have to take out their families. When you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families."

"I think Islam hates us. There's something there that, there a tremendous hatred."

He makes erratic hateful remarks, racist comments, misogynistic comments, mocks disabled people. It certainly seems to me like he thrives of hatred and fear.

Many people call the faction that's causing so much trouble in the U.S. the "Bush/Clinton Cabal". They are working together.

But, the original meaning of demagogue is "politician for the people". The elite added the negative connotations. And, Hillary's people are arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people by calling Trump a racist, a sexist, and a Russia-lover (pointing to old fears of "commies" taking over the world).
The "wall" is not a new thing. It's already being built: imgflip.com/i/16owam
And, in Trumps speeches, he doesn't describe everything as a "threat". He wants to curb illegal immigrants, not let Muslims from war torn countries in without serious vetting, and is very willing to work with other countries (like Russia). If you look around, you'll find that the anti-Trump activists are much more hateful than the Trump supporters.

That wasn't the point: As I said, "Apart from the debt itself". It was the rest of the article that had some interesting info.

"One example is an office building on Sixth Avenue in Manhattan, which is indebted by $950 million. The two major backers are the Bank of China and Goldman Sachs. Mr Trump has railed against China for not paying its fair share of taxes for “taking” American manufacturing jobs, and he has blasted his rival Hillary Clinton for accepting $675,000 in speaking fees from Goldman Sachs."

Blasting Hillary for being in bed with Goldman Sachs, from in between the sheets of Goldman Sachs...

"The claims of heavy debt also come shortly after Ms Clinton visited the abandoned, Trump-branded casino buildings in Atlantic City, where she condemned her opponent’s business tactic of loading up companies with debt without taking any personal liability and washing his hands of ownership before they go bankrupt."

This isn't the only time he has ripped of construction companies so they go completely bankrupt.

"If the real estate mogul does make it to the White House, the tradition of past presidents is to place their assets in so-called “blind trusts” – selling the original assets and replacing it with other assets unknown to the seller. His children, who would run his company, have not indicated using such a fund, raising questions about a possible conflict of interest between the president and the corporate world."

Wouldn't he want to be impartial?

Donald Trump doesn't own the "Trump-branded Casino", he built it, handed it to the owner, and licenses his name to the place if the owners think they need the Trump name to get started.

To build any large building, Trump has to get funding. He works with Chinese bankers all the time. Today, China (AIIB) has a gold-backed juan and is an international trade currency. To deal directly in U.S. debt-back dollars today is not a good move. He'll deal with Russia and BRICS when the sanctions are lifted.

Past presidents have put their assets in "blind trusts" so We, the People can't see it. Hillary's money is so hidden, we have no clue what she's doing. I have no problem with a transparent president. Especially one that seems to have put the corporate world on edge. . . they want Hillary not Trump.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-sells-qatar-12-billion-arms-days-after-accusing-it-of-funding-terrorism/

Oops! What a surprise?!