At best a neo-con, most likely another yuge RINO

When you attack anyone for supporting Israel ("wars for Israel" nonsense), it comes across as anti-Semitic. Israel is the victim, Arabs are the aggressors. Learn that and you'll go far.

Anyone can make any graphic say anything. It's invalidated with words like 'Palenstine' and 'Zionist'... The US Supports Israel, our ally, and rightful owner of their land.

Israel is not a U.S. "ally". According to law, the U.S. cannot enter into a treaty unless the country has defined borders. Israel refuses to define its borders.

okie doke

You'd be surprised how much editing goes on to get those "quotes". Recently, the news tried to tie Trump to a quote that came from Hillary months ago.

I don't watch the news anymore since they've been in the tank for Trump in the primaries. I know what I've heard from his own mouth directly. His past positions which he admits to. And his abominable behavior during this campaign. Both he and Hillary are not worthy of the office of president at all. It's a sad state the GOP has gotten us in but there it is.

In 1998, Trump testified to Congress that the new tax law was hurting the country. . . especially affordable housing. In 2002, he said that going to war in Iraq was stupid. He likes Single-Payer Health Care but he doesn't think he can get it in today's political climate so he's going to restructure Obamacare to make it more affordable. Because Obama ran out of money trying to build the Wall that Bush signed into law, he's going to find ways of making Mexico pay for it.

So.... he was wrong on Iraq... He's wrong on Single Payer... he's going to keep Obamacare... He thinks he can force a sovereign nation to pay for a US project...

He's nuts.

You made my case.

He was not wrong on Iraq. It was an illegal war of aggression and only created ISIS. He's not wrong on Single Payer. . . it works. And, all he has to do is charge admission to the U.S. to get Mexico to pay for Bush's Wall (which Clinton voted "Yes" on, by the way).

Sigh. Iraq war was not illegal at all. It was legal on its own merits but equally legal enforcing the UN resolutions still in effect from the first Gulf War. Completely and 100% legal (debated all this back then). Single payer is a failure everywhere it's been tried... not constitutional to provide health care for citizens, so it WOULD be illegal in the USA clearly.

Seems odd you support liberal policies (single payer) and dogma (anti-Israel, anti-Iraq war) and Trump does to, but you seem to be against Clinton who is also as liberal as yourself.

Tribunal at Nuremberg: "To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime". Britain has had a national health care program since just after WWII. . . still working. Nationalized Health Care is not "unconstitutional" and, therefore, not illegal. Clinton is farther right than Trump. . . and she's evil. And, I'm not a liberal. I'm a libertarian socialist.

Agree with Nuremberg and Iraq initiated the war of aggression as it patently obvious.

Where in the Constitution is the power granted to force the citizens to pay for the health care for others? Nowhere -- thus unconstitutional -- no question.

Britain's system does not work as has been shown. Waiting lists, yes, even "death panels" where providing of care is rationed... no thanks. We don't need that here.

Clinton may be to the "right" of Trump as you claim, but they are both liberals and far to the left of political scale. Not even close to moderate.

But ok, libertarian is bad. Libertarian socialist is even worse. Sorry for you... but it explains how you're so off base with everything.

Enjoyed it... you opened my eyes to yet another nutcase, anti-American viewpoint. I'll let you have the last comment if you like but I'm done. Until you want to educate yourself, it would be pointless.

Iraq did not initiate the war. . . the U.S. did.
Where does it say in the U.S. Constitution that a National Health Care is wrong. In fact, it fits into the "General Welfare Clause". (Be careful the propaganda you're fed).

No, both candidates are far right of center. Clinton is farther right than Trump. Sanders was barely left of center and not a "socialist" but a "social democrat". Kucinich if farther left than Bernie but still a Capitialist.

Libertarian is bad? I do like my freedom. Sorry you don't.