Flawed liberal logic

But you didn't answer the question of the meme. They didn't even have a chance to defend themselves in France because of gun control laws.

For one, private establishments like the Pulse club DO have gun control laws. Do you know many clubs that allow firearms? How could a gun owner stop a shooting when THEY AREN'T ALLOWED TO BRING THEIR GUNS INTO THE CLUB FOR SELF DEFENSE? High schools don't allow firearms either.

What do you expect? For every gun-owner to be a superhero and stop every shooting? There have been way, WAY more shootings STOPPED by gun owners.

Here's a recent example of a shooter being stopped by a legal gun owner:

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/30/concealed-carrier-takes-down-shooter-at-south-caro/

Do you have any respect for the constitution?

I don't live in the USA so the constitution does not apply to me so I don't care about it. And when I read your "logic" on guns Im quite glad I don't live in the USA.

Then what business do you have commenting on it?

Judging by your hockey memes you must be from Canada? Makes sense. And your "logic" says we should have MORE defenseless people? What sense does that make?

Criminals and killers are going to find a way to get a gun so why make it harder on good people to get one for self defense?

And you didn't even acknowledge that examples you listed are places that don't allow guns.