IK. There was big debate whether punching spencer was ok. I actually had a LONG debate with somebody over free speech on a formal debate site. Hate speech is in fact protected right now so nobody at the moment should stop it. If somebody uses hate speech, we have to let them as the law allows it. If laws change fine, but for now, law is law. I feel hate speech though needs to have rules though. I feel if a speech is being given, rules should be made that insults and mockery are not allowed. If people want to say what problems a group causes fine. But in all speech in general I think any insults used can be subject to terminating the speech. I feel insults do nothing except put people down and can make them targets and thats where I draw the line. The problem is that people who use hate speech say insulting things about certain groups all the time.I feel for now that it's just words and people have choise whether to listen or not. I also draw the line more so when literal death threats or threats to hurt are being made as I see that as encouragement of chaos. I don't think it should be a very harsh punishment as long as its just words, but very harsh punishment if actions are proven to be caused mainly by the speech. This is why people censor hate speech so much though. People are free to do hate speech, but if they want to keep their priviledge, they need to adjust how they make their speech. Cause also in my arguement, if people literally can say what they want and defend that right so hard, then eventually everyone is gonna start walking up to each other saying things like "hey your good raping material." and say its free speech. I agree with free speech, but if people want to keep that priviledge, there needs to be a rule that a point needs to be made rather than just have a list of insulting things about other people.
Caption this Meme
