You claim I orchestrated a premeditated framing operation because your username appeared in the title of a meme. You think the people of Imgflip are supposed to believe that I would orchestrate an entire sting operation. I pointed out that your name was in the title as evidence that you made the meme (because we often distinguish ourselves so everyone knows who it is their talking too). And yet, somehow, you have somehow provided no good explanation as to why your username appears in the title in the first place. You instead have resorted to accusing me of meticulously planning this entire argument beforehand, as if I had somehow predicted your every move and devised an elaborate scheme to frame you. A good diversion tactic, I will admit, but it isn't merely enough to distract me. Furthermore, I find it rather peculiar that you have spent more time attempting to discredit the prosecution than providing a coherent explanation for the evidence presented against him. I therefore ask the court to return its attention to the central question of this case:
If you did not create this meme, why does your username appear in its title?
