Democrats are flat out Evil.

Please give an example of your claim. Otherwise it's just typical left wing BS.

In January 2025 Republican Rep. Andy Ogles introduced a joint resolution to amend the Constitution to allow a president to serve up to three terms, explicitly framing the change as a way to "sustain the bold leadership our nation so desperately needs" and to revise limitations imposed by the 22nd Amendment. Such a proposal serves as a concrete illustration of GOP loyalty to Trump. Ogles admitted himself that the purpose of the proposal was to allow Trump to serve a third term. In addition, Trump himself has been asked if he's considered running for (or conspiring to obtain) a third term, and he's responded with "I don't know, we'll see..." Can you not see how it's concerning that there is a faction of Congress Republicans who want to throw out 250 years of precedent set by George Washington and 75 years of precedent set by the 22nd Amendment itself? All of what I just said is easily verifiable and backed by nonpartisan independent reporting.

So how is that "Desecrating the Constitution"? If he doesn't get 2 thirds of support from Congress there is no change. And you can introduce these things legally and most likely they would fail anyway. You are trying too hard to demonize Republicans. Maybe you have been so propagandized you have no reasoning skills but those of us who have seen many decades of the same shenannigans from the Dems, we are more in the know of their treachery.

I don't demonize Republicans. I have conservative friends and family. I don't think the majority of them are any less human than I. Trump has publicly said he is "not joking" about the possibility of seeking a third term and told NBC News there are "methods" to do so outside of amending the Constitution. In October 2025, he told reporters on Air Force One that he would "love to do it." In early May 2026, during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Senator Chris Coons (D-DE) questioned a panel of federal judicial nominees appointed by Trump about the 22nd Amendment. Coons specifically asked John George Edward Marck, a nominee for the Southern District of Texas, if President Trump is eligible to run for a third term. Marck declined to give a definitive "no." He characterized the question as a "hypothetical," stating, "Without considering all the facts and looking at everything depending on what the situation is, this strikes me as more of a hypothetical." When pressed further on the plain language of the Constitution, Marck responded that he "would have to review the wording of it." Coons then asked the other nominees on the panel to weigh in, and they remained silent. That's a plain example of Republicans who claim to be servants of the law refusing to acknowledge the existence of a 75-year-old well-known Constitutional amendment.

And you don't remember Bath-house Barry saying if he could he'd be in a basement giving instructions to his puppet for his 3rd term? Which is why he chose the puppet Biden as his VP as Biden had no previous good things about him and were a proven liar from his 1980s bid for President. He were called out by the press and proven a liar. So Barry selects him as his VP so he can have an easily manipulated puppet to control like we've seen with Biden's actual administration. A person not giving a definite answer is not them "desecrating the constitution" BTW. You are grasping at straws. Who teaches you this stuff?

Where's the source for that Barack comment?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUMeS-fWvOs slightly longer.

To respond to your latest comment, as the reply chain got too long, there is no evidence that Snopes receives U.S. government funding to promote leftist propaganda; its declared revenues are commercial and reader‑supported, with disclosed platform and private donations but no recorded federal grants. To maintain its certification with the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN)—which requires strict funding transparency and non-partisanship—Snopes must publicly disclose how it makes its money.

Do you realise that these organisations get their money from "private funding" means people like George Soros and most likely more misappropriated money. Giving yourselves a sparkling review of your unbiased viewpoints doesn't make them true. North Korea's official name uses the word "Democratic". You can roll a turd in sugar and honey but when you bite into it, it's still just shit. This is what the left do to legitimize themselves in gullible people's eyes.

It's not just U.S. government funding they can't receive either. Going back to their IFCN certification, they literally can't accept money from leftists or conservatives. Snopes explicitly states in its editorial policy that it does not accept political advertising, government grants, or funding from political parties, politicians, or PACs to ensure financial independence. Their revenue statements and third party audits shown on Traxcn and Crunchbase prove this.

International Fact-Checking Network: a self appointed organisation saying it's the standard of unbiased investigative journalism. You'd have to pretty gullible to believe that. Safe and Effective right?

I'm also not saying Biden wasn't a bumbling fool... he absolutely was not fit to be president. But his mental health is just as bad as Trump's, who falls asleep during cabinet meetings and his own Board of Peace meetings, can't pronounce acetaminophen, and when he gets bored with what the White House speechwriters give him he just starts repeating the same buzzwords. IMHO, all politicians these days are the damn same.

For all of Trump's negative points at least he's doing what he says he will do. The deportations (that you automatically believe are "racist" because of your indoctrination), peace through strength by putting Iran in it's place after 47 years of terrorism is most excellent in my books. Look at the rhetoric coming out of the media talking about how violent the right is when they are committing all the acts. The SPLC funding it's own groups so they can keep their jobs of fighting racism. It's an industry and Al Sharpton is a perfect example.

Here he is talking about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JI2Xtqd4Mts

This is from an interview on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, a late-night comedy program. What he said was a joke (though it's in pretty bad taste). Snopes actually fact-checked this independently: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-third-term-stand-in-quote/. Obama was reflecting on the dichotomy of the presidency. He explained that he found the actual policy work and problem-solving to be deeply fascinating. In reality, the quote was simply a self-deprecating joke about wanting to do the intellectual work of a president without having to put on a suit or stand behind a podium.

Again there you go with the left wing paid propaganda of snopes. They are no experts despite being self declared "fact-checkers". All they do is look at all the news articles that are biased and make their determination. The media is 95% left leaning and you can just see it in the bias they put out constantly. It's time for you to wake up to it. Wonder why the Dems were so upset with DOGE finding fraud? Because it's them misappropriating the money to fund the propaganda. Your downplay of this "as a joke" is not what we saw with the Biden admin. The vegetable could hardly be coherent on his own and he were not making decisions. Someone else were... maybe not with an earpiece but actually giving the orders.