I don't believe in monkeys because I believe we are indeed in a simulation

ok

im tired lol

Im agnostic because we may never truly for sure know

That big beautiful sky you commented is proof

Beauty like that can't be an accident

And life continues to exist in a perfect life cycle

Do you even notice me sdiybt ing that guy

sdiybt

Sdiybt

What's that mean

Start diggin in yo butt twin

If your talking about es no I don't see that

Look at the image in my comment

Ohhhh bruh I thought that was sum dragon ball or hxh character 😂

No, we have already proven why the sky exists without needing a God, we have proven why everything beautiful exists without needing a God. The sky is not proof.

No, there is no proof. We have proven along with other very smart scientists on why everything needs a god.

"A little science leads away from God, a lot of science leads back"

Can you provide said proof? I would not consider myself to be amazing at science, but I don't consider myself too ignorant to miss such a big conclusion. If you mean philosophical principles, I do understand many of those and are willing to provide counterarguments against them to defend my viewpoint.

Reasons God exists?

If the universe was a big accident, how come life is able to continue on forever and ever, we will always have water, animals will always reproduce, air will never run out. Planets rotate in a perfectly accurate formation in outer space that is perfectly suitable for us to live. Outer space is absolutely and infinitely gigantic and the sun and planets are perfectly aligned for life on earth.

If we came to be by an explosion or accident, the chance is far too small. Also, something cannot come from nothing. That much is true

I have a great counterpoint.

One day a puddle wakes up. It says "Wow, this world I am in is perfectly suited for me. It must have been made by another being for me."

We think these processes and environments must have intelligent design because they suit us perfectly. I say otherwise. We evolved to suit our environment perfectly. Also, there are about 22 sextillon planets in the observable universe alone. There is a near 100% chance of life working well on at least one of these planets. If one single planet had intelligent life in the universe, the life on it would think it crazy that their planet is perfect, but it isn't, because they are the only ones who can comment on that because their planet is perfect. Also, space being huge isn't a shocker to me, personally, but feel free to explain why it is to you.

Finally, while nothing can come from nothing, true nothingness is impossible. There always has to be something, like laws, quantum fluctuations, or virtual particles.

So, no, the chance of our existence is ridiculously high. We can exist without a God.

How did the puddle get there in the first place? Why didn't the world die before we had time to evolve, if evolution exists?

The puddle got there because of natural processes, this one being the water cycle. The puddle argument is a comedic take on fine tuning that is used to point out the flaws in the argument. I used it to also explain why nature suits us well.

Why didn't the world die before we evolved? The world could have died, but seeing that life survived many mass extinctions, the chances see pretty low. Also, with how many planets there are, there must be plenty with intelligent life, and a handful with extremely intelligent life like us. Like I mentioned earlier, they might think it is crazy that they exist, but they are the only ones who can comment on it, and their liklihood of existence is near 100%.

Are you saying that there has never been a point in time where nothing existed

Yes. From how we understand the universe, something always had to exist. What scientists think of as nothing is a quantum vacuum. These vacuum do not contain particles, but do contain quantum fields, quantum laws, and virtual particals that briefly appear and dissapear. True nothingness is impossible, even if no particles exist.

Then how did matter become to exist? If here was always something, then something else had to create it

Matter could have come to exist through quantum fluctuations thag were inflated. I do not know all of the science, nor do I understand it, but scientists have determined it is possible thag matter could have come from quantum fluctuations in a vacuum. Please do your own research in to this.

I have done my research, you don't have an answer of the beginning of the universe, you don't know how matter came into being. But I do, and I think it was beautifully and wonderfully designed by God in 6 days

God creating the world has not been proven and is not the only possibillity. There are many models for the universe's creation that have mounds of reliable evidence to back them up. Evidence for God is unreliable or false. Please, if you have proof that you have not already mentioned, tell me.

The idea that the earth has a creator is the only actual option. All other ideas lead to void because something has to have an origin or time of creation, God doesn't.

No, there are well accepted models of the universe that have a time of creation, but if that seems illogical, there are also well accepted models of an eternal universe.

What is a model of an eternal universe?

I'm going to become green

Ough

fr

The fact that everyone's hating on this rn 😭

“Sky daddy” is worse

bro this is not true its not even a good argument

It just happened on Pinterest lmao

this aithiest must not know how to debate then. im not great, and i know that argument sucks

Yeah, they just don't understand either side enough