No curve, no ball.

There is a slight curve in the line that would connect the tops of the Lego towers. But the curve is too small to see over this short of a distance wit the unaided eye, which brings me to my second point:
Trying to find the curve of the earth over this distance is simply illogical. There's not enough distance to show the curve. This gif is set up to show exactly what you want it to show.

The lack of 1 Empirical "curvature" measurement that is provable, shown, seen, repeatable for a circumference of approx 40 000 km is the only proof you need to know the Earth is not a spinning ball of water. It's still funny after 2 years reading comments from indoctrinated globe-worshipers, always the same responses, always mocking, always worplay, rhetoric, yet, never a shred of evidence to prove the pear/sphere/ball-o-wawa in space. Curved water has NOT been found, deal with it.

You want proof of the earth's curve?
Eratosthenes of Cyrene calculated the curvature of the earth with nothing more than shadows and basic math over 2000 years ago, with starting accuracy compared to today's measurements. So you're telling me that "indoctrinated globe-worshipers" have existed for over 2000 years?

I hope you realize just how dumb that sounds.

LoL, you haven't looked into this topic obviously. You would know that Eratosthenes "experiment" also functions on a flat plane. Go do some research. I'm telling you "Curved water sticking to a spinning ball" DOES NOT EXIST, and you show up with an already debunked 'Eratosthenes'? R O F L, priceless, you got nothing. Go try your little 'Eratosthenes' bs on ANY Flat-Earth forum and see how long it takes you to realize how pathetic your "proof" is. hahahahh

Yes, it also functions on a flat plane, but the results of the experiment would be completely different because you changed one of the given variables.

I also love how you accuse us "globe worshippers" of being "always mocking" and then respond with the comment above.

I also have yet to see one point of definable evidence from you as to why the earth would be flat. You've just told me that everything I say is wrong. Heck, I think that I'm the only one doing ANY research in this discussion!

I find the term 'globe-worshipers' pretty nice compared to other FE'ers' name-calling, I'll use globe-enthusiast if I hurt your feelings, sorry.

The term is not what bothers me, its that fact that you accuse globe-worshipers (or globe-enthusiast, or whatever, I really don't care) of mocking flat earth, always using wordplay, etc., when in this debate, I'm the one trying to bring legitimate reason and basis for my claims, while you're the one blowing me off and belittling my points.

There is a lot of scientific and mathematical problems with a flat earth that I am willing to discuss. But I don't understand why you have to diss on every point I bring up.

How do you not see the curve