Also, to no flesh and blood can be in heaven, I'm not entirely sure about this either, but I do think that Jesus took the form of a man and restrained himself forever in it out of his love for us. I think that he is using Paul's verse incorrectly but I don't know how, and I'll need to look into that.
There are some interesting and good points in there. I also think the use of images of Jesus as idolatry and symbolism are bad. I mean I haven't looked enough into it to be sure about just decoration and historical pictures in a stained glass window in a church purely for the beauty that comes from it, but we definitely should not worship it. I completely agree with you on that. The Ba'al Preacher part was a little confusing since not all false prophets and heretics preach Ba'al but I'm guessing it's just a kind of symbolism for all false prophets. However, we do know what ethnicity Jesus would have been at the time, and it was Hebrew (or Jewish I can't remember the exact differences.) This would lead us to believe that he was olive-skinned, but I still don't think we should try to make a picture of it to make worshipping it more accurate, because that would still be sinful. That's actually an interesting point he makes about them making Jesus the same skin color as the pastor or using that for slaves. I haven't looked into that at all but it honestly sounds like something they would do. When he said God was not a man, I agree with that, because God is made of three Persons, The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit. The Son was both God and Man, however. Just wanted to make sure he wasn't disaffirming that.
