No because as we've seen with Trump crimes can be fabricated by overzealous prosecutors and found guilty by opposing judges. The founders were very wise.

Trump testified against him to law enforcement first.

"Tf? Why would I respect you?"

Not a nazi dude. Clearly if you were paying attention you would know I'm a constitutional libertarian just like the founding fathers.

My question was rhetorical. It was meant to make you think.

Islam has the same methodology as nazism, except its cloaked in religion.

Nope. Constitution trumps any law made after it. Now they could have held a trial, invited him to show up, came with a guilty verdict, and 12 jurors could have sentenced him to death to be carried out by the military and that would have been legal.

He is worthy of being praised. In the same way someone that breaks records and does amazing things is worthy of praise.
You don't validate his existence through worship, you align with truth.
Your last part seems like a plain contradiction tauatology.