Yes.
The original King James Version of 1611 was produced by roughly forty-seven scholars organized into six companies meeting at Westminster, Oxford, and Cambridge—among them Lancelot Andrewes (who directed the First Westminster Company translating Genesis through 2 Kings and was reputed fluent in about fifteen languages), William Bedwell (the leading Arabic scholar of the age), John Bois (who could read the Hebrew Bible by age five or six and was an exacting Greek grammarian who later served on the final revision committee), Edward Lively (Regius Professor of Hebrew at Cambridge), Miles Smith (who helped finalize the text and wrote the translators’ preface), John Reynolds, Henry Savile, Thomas Bilson, John Overall, Laurence Chaderton, Andrew Downes, and the rest of the First and Second Westminster, Cambridge, and Oxford companies—scholars who, relative to many modern specialists, possessed the advantages of living in England’s early-seventeenth-century “golden age” of biblical and Oriental learning, of acquiring deep facility in Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Aramaic, Syriac, Arabic, and multiple modern European languages from youth onward rather than through narrow later specialization, of combining rigorous linguistic mastery with broad classical and patristic learning plus a strong cultivated sense of English literary style, and of working through a multi-layered collaborative process of translation, mutual review, and final revision that produced a text both accurate by the standards of their day and of exceptional literary quality.
Modern scholars barely come close and use trash heap and corrupted versions because the papers were dated older.
Yep, except it wasn't the fruit that made them see good and evil. It was the act of defying God. They also were already like God with wisdom and knowledge. So you proved yourself wrong again.
