Exactly, I just said that lunch programs aren't socialism. Also despite the goal of Marxist socialism being to have the means of production owned and controlled by the workers, it always had the means of production owned and controlled by the government which obviously isn't having it owned and controlled by the workers but controlled by a very totalitarian government which i of course am not for.
Yes I do unlike you who calls every economic policy he doesn't like 'socialism' amd doesn't know what the word even means and the more you randomly Parrot it, the more the word loses its meaning.
The definition of socialism is an economic system where the means of production are owned an controlled by the workers according to Marxist theory. And I do not adhere to extremist ideologies like Marxism or even "democratic socialism" not only because Marxist regimes like Cuba and Venezuela have complete and total government tyranny and mass poverty and starvation but also because workers owning the means of production sounds not very practical. Making a coffee or manufacturing a chair doesn't automatically make you the owner of it, the real owners of the things you make for a company are the owners of the company that makes the items, you just get paid to help them make it and the only thing you own is your wages.
Things I am for such as lunch programs for school children, universal Healthcare, paid parental leave and livable wage for the working man aren't Marxist socialism, they are social welfare policies within capitalist systems that are funded by the capitalist system to maintain the well-being of people and their children. That's part of a well-functioning society, a society that knows that taking care of its people is part of what makes a society adequate. That's what every other developed nation has but America unfortunately doesn't and corporate propaganda think tanks brainwash people into thinking such policies are "socialist tyranny" when it's not and Americans are so indoctrinated by corporate propaganda that they mindlessly parrot any talking point from propaganda they listen to and don't actually know what the actual definition of anything is.
Just to be clear, I only defend gay people who actually do mind their own business and not the ones who act like a bunch of petty little assholes who think that not waving a rainbow flag or buying Harry Potter merchandise is an "act of anti-LGBT violence".
You are talking bs and you know it because you're basically making the argument that gay people who mind their own business, do nothing to anyone, especially not other people's families are somehow "destroying families" as if another person being gay is gonna make a father turn gay and leave his wife. You're just exposing how fragile your sexuality is but then again, lots of conservatives are closet gay and cheat on their wives. If there is anyone who is starting an argument because he clearly has nothing better to do, it's obviously you.
