I read the snopes argument, it doesn't debunk the vector layers, the layers have printing behind the typed words that appear when the typing is removed. It says there's some software floating around that can scan in layers but it doesn't say what software was used, why would they use some high tech scanner to scan a simple document, where is this magic scanner? The logical conclusion is that it was made on a computer, and not simply scanned from a real document. They messed up and released the certificate without making sure nobody would see the layers.
Snopes has a way of throwing some technical sounding words at a something they want to debunk without ever actually debunking anything. Like I said the truth is easy, snopes is hardly ever on the side of truth. Snopes is no more credible than me sitting on my couch, basically that's what it is, a middle aged couple on their couch surfing the internet.
Not trying to be the goal post here, but just like snopes, you want people to ignore the obvious and believe some elaborate story. Its simple, biden is on video admitting what he was doing in Ukraine, trump was investigating his corruption, Biden got caught, Pelosi was holding bidens opponents captive while he was able to run his campaign freely, if he could get into the frontrunner position then they could say trump was investigating his front running opponent and maybe biden could win. But biden is on video, we've all seen and heard about his corruption from his own mouth... it's easy. Trump may be a first class shithead but this right vs left circus isn't helping expose him.
658 pages is quite a read, I asked what his crime was and you have offered 658 pages, 658 pages, just to answer what should be a simple question. What if it was me offering you 658 pages of truth to impeach Obama when he was in office? Of course you're going to say you would have read it and made a fair decision and listened to my vague arguments but would you really? Think about it, what if the table was turned. Did you look into Obama's birth certificate allegations or did you trust that someone else had and debunked it? If you did look into it at all it was pretty easy to find the truth, not sifting through 658 pages either, his birth certificate had vector layers, which means it was made on a computer, computers didn't exist when he was born. Easy right? Impeachable offence right? The truth is simple and accessible, 658 pages is not simple or accessible. I was trying to expand your world view and maybe get you to take a step back and look at big picture stuff for a moment, but the journey is yours.