Lee Strobel Does Not Approve.

"He isn't an historian." So what? He's an investigative journalist.

So, according to you, credible historians ignore evidence.

The last sentence is incorrect. Given the evidence, it would be ludicrous to conclude that "The claim that Jesus rose from the dead is not most likely true". Also "He isn't an historian." is grammatically incorrect and completely meaningless (He either once was or still is an investigative journalist). Also, the last sentence of your original argument is a No True Scotsman argument.

The only charge of yours that is actually an accurate charge is the number of documents and the time frame.

whats the evidence then