politics

Instead, what we have is some of the Black brothers....unenlightened by their White liberal education, cursing Christianity as a White man oppressive religion and flocking to join islam....islam is a Black man's religion they cry (here is a hint my Black friends: neither is White or Black....they both are Semitic religions, as is Judaism). And that Arab islamic religion...why they were your second slavemasters.....right after your own Black African brothers who were the very first to enslave you.

This "entire stripping of language, culture, family and true-knowledge of self" that some Black Americans complain of was (and is) done to slaves around the entire world. No country or culture was exempt from this "atrocity"....NONE.....even the Tibetan Buddhist had slaves. It was not unique to the Europeans or America or the New World.

2-4 million European slaves were taken by the Black Barbary pirates into Africa before the Europeans had started the slave trade from Africa and even the Europeans were late to the scene because the Arabs were taking slaves out of Africa for thousands of years before them. Today those Europeans slaves that were taken out of Europe by Africans are no more And all you can comment on is how fair the Algerians, Libyans and such are. They are not Christian and do not speak any European languages (except those learnt later under colonialism). They also have no European culture, and they could complain in a fit of childish rage that they have no family nor sense of self, except that they don't as this is just made-up.....indoctrinated into those of a weak mind by liberal Whites who are on a mission to keep Blacks in their snare.

Yet, no one speaks of that now, and why is that?

You think that you as a Black have in bad in America? Then tell me....what African country would you like to live in to get a sense of family or sense of self? (As an aside, there are DNA tests that can tell you exactly where you are from Africa).

Maybe it is the Sudan where the fair-skinned Blacks enslave the dark-skinned Blacks today, or, maybe it is in Libya and the surrounding African countries where Blacks fleeing the eutopia that is Southern Africa towards the racist shithole that is Europe and North America are caught like animals and enslaved and those who are too weak to keep up are killed on the spot, just like in the jolly old times.

Or, maybe it is Mauritania (the very last country in the world to "free" its slaves and which also happens to be an African country) where there is still 5-20 % slavery today among dark-skinned Blacks mastered over by their light-skinned Black brothers, a practice so ancient that Blacks when they are told that they can leave their masters, will cling to them and refuse to leave their masters and praise them to high heaven: That they are all muslims and strongly influenced by the words and actions of the prophet is also a factor.

Or, maybe it is Saudi Arabia where Black slaves were only freed in 1962, almost 100 years after slaves were freed in America (and only under great pressure by the Europeans), over 500,000 of them. But, have you heard of a Black Saudi Arabian? They must be millions of them now but they are unseen. I have never seen one on TV, never mind being broadcasters or TV announcers. There are no Black teachers, bankers, actresses, public personalities: they are unseen in Saudi Arabian Society as if they do not exist. But there is a derogatory term for Blacks in Saudi Arabia that is used to this day "Abeed" which means "slave" and the obligatory revulsed spit that follows. In Saudi Arabia, the "pure" Saudi Arabians have a genetic list of the purity of their ancestors' "arabicness" that is shared when marriage is being proposed between families. A family will never marry yours if your family shows one drop of Black blood in your ancestry: even if you show all the "noble" blood of an arab.
But enough of this, let us move to the question of who gets the blame for the African slave trade?
Is it the Africans from the larger tribes who had conquered smaller tribes and held their conquered Black brothers as slaves in brutal labour for thousands of years before the Europeans had ever come onto the scene? Then only to sell them to the Europeans when that chance was presented to them after thousands of years of enslaving their own?
Was it the arabs and muslims who were part of that same slave trade of selling Blacks to Europeans benefitting from having been in Africa for thousands of years before the Europeans, looting Blacks from that continent and taking them to their Arabic countries? (as an aside the arabs took more slaves out of Africa and more Africans had died crossing the Sahara than died crossing the Atlantic

But yet, no word of condemnation from Blacks to the Arabs and other muslims for enslaving them but only condemnation towards the Europeans, who by the way, were the very ones to start the anti-slavery movement and then went on to free slaves in every part of the world by military force at an enormous cost to their treasuries (the British in particular) that created a world free of slavery for the very first time in its history, by a culture which paradoxically you condemn! (well, free in most of the world except for the African brothers holding their own as slaves: all muslim countries by the way!)...And ain't that something!