The left doesn't even seem to view Melania as a person. She is just a means to insult her husband. Now that's misogynistic.

"W**re" and "prostitute" are generally thought to mean the same thing, although "w**re" is generally more pejorative. Nude model is all we have confirmed. This is not prostitute, however, it is generally considered to be a "sex worker" or "sex professional." So respect the profession, is that what you are saying?

1. Nude modeling does not equal sex work, as no sexual acts are performed. You are eroniously sexualizing nudity.
2. Even if she had, in the past, performed sexual services for money, I fail to see how it would be currently relevant.
3. "W**re" and "prostitute" are used explicitly as insults against Melania. These words are never used as insults against males in prominent posistions. The misogynistic undertones of the use of these words is undeniable, they imply that a woman forever tainted by past sexual choices (while men are not).
4. The left's decision to consistently insult Melania, does not even appear to be about her as an ondividual. She is viewed merely as an extension of her husband. The denial of her as an individual, but merely as a part of (or belonging of) her husband is the height of misogyny.
5. If she were unmarried, the left would consider her nude modeling not only a valid career choice, but an empowering one that gives her indepenence.

while ignoring the hypocrisy of those people who used to rant about "family values" who now find it is OK when Melania does it.

you are correct that nude modeling is not generally considered to be sex worker but it is in a grey area close to the intersection. There was a time when nude models were commonly called prostitutes. But I'll give you this one.

Your dumb

*you're
I'd normally let that go, but since you are too lazy to type more than two words, the least you could do is get both of them right.

I'm pretty sure I heard from some liberals that both of those things are "empowering."