Only White Pride Is RACIST

Only White Pride Is RACIST | WE MUST SECURE THE EXISTENCE OF OUR PEOPLE AND A FUTURE FOR BLACK CHILDREN. = OKAY WE MUST SECURE THE EXISTENCE OF OUR PEOPLE AND A FUTURE F | image tagged in racism,racist,white supremacy,white privilege,culture,political meme | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
5,629 views, 138 upvotes, Made by MAGA_PATRIOT 2 months ago racismracistwhite supremacywhite privilegeculturepolitical meme
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
[deleted]
9 ups
All of them are racist. We ought to build a future for all people and not focus on subjective and arbitrarily set racial boundaries.
reply
9 ups, 2 replies
I like how the Latino family have the most children. Cause it's so true.
reply
7 ups
GOOD CATHOLICS KEEP MAKA DE BABY | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Philosoraptor Meme | Southeast Asian family probably Thais. | image tagged in memes,philosoraptor | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
WHO HAS MORE CHILDREN, LATINOS OR ASIANS? IT'S PROBABLY A THAI | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
1 up
THIS MEME GIVES ME AN IDEA FOR ANOTHER KICKASS MOVIE NOW, WHAT COULD I GO BACK TO THAILAND TO RETREIVE? | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
[deleted]
8 ups, 1 reply
Creepy Condescending Wonka Meme | WHITE PEOPLE MAKE UP THE SMALLEST POPULATION ON THE PLANET YET ARE THE ONLY DEMOGRAPHIC NOT CALLED A MINORITY | image tagged in memes,creepy condescending wonka | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
doublethink wasn't just an idea in a book
reply
5 ups, 3 replies
It depends where. In japan, white people are a minority. In The Netherlands, they aren't. Context matters.
reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 2 replies
I'm speaking globally
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Globally, Caucasians are the most widespread people on the planet, being the majority in the Americas and Australasia, the second largest in Eurasia, and a minority in Africa. To call their numbers small is preposterously ridiculous.
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1 reply
reply
1 up
What, you talking about the Amish?
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Globally, yes, white people are a minority.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
The races they've opppressed and nearly exterminated beg to differ.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
True, but I just meant in terms of sheer numbers.
reply
2 ups
There's an immense amount, and spread throughout places far from their homelands, displacing indigeneous populations.
Look at the Americas - two continents, an entire hemishere - once occupied by mainly by one group that has been rendered a dwindling minority. The few survivers are being blended totally out of existence.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Are you suggesting that white people throughout history are the main source of slavery?

Remember, it was the African tribe leaders in Africa that were enslaving their own people before the white man came and bought them.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Ever look out your window?

The African slave trade began with African groups selling enemies - not their own people - captured in wars to the Portuguese, as well as Arabs capturing and selling non Moslem Africans. The Portuguese eventually started capturing them themselves, as did later Europeans involved in the trade.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
Thanks for the history lesson. I still haven't got an answer to my question, though.

Are you suggesting that white people throughout history are the main cause of slavery?
reply
1 up, 2 replies
If white people are the main cause of slavery THROUGHOUT history?

Nice trick question, since slavery has gone on since ancient times (Hell, while there's no records, it is rather plausible that Homo Sapiens enslaving Neanderthals they didn't kill (mainly women and children) provided the main condition through which the Caucasion race was sired), and continues today, with even more people in bondage now than the days of the Atlantic Slave Trade. But given the world population then, and volume of slaves (even more if you include indentured servants as well as failed attempts to enslave Native Americans) and white people were the main cause of slavery at the time. The number of people they brought in have left over a hundred million decendents in the Western Hemisphere today, and London is still benefitting from the trade, since banking and insurance built around it made it into the economic center it is.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
The way you worded your original statement it sounded like you were blaming white people for the majority of slavery, which is why I asked.
1 up
You mean I wasted both our time on that wall of drivel?
I just meant their particular impact compared to them being called a minority.

Everyone has dirt under their nails, some worse.
Ever notice that pockets of Islam in Africa and Asia are in ports or along overland trade routes? Under their religion, anything goes with anyone who isn't one. The only immunity is to be a Muslim. So when Arab traders went about, they'd kidnap a couple of 'infidels' they traded with here and there ("Come on boat, I give you pay, my friend, *!BONK!*"), causing many in these places over time to convert to Islam as protection. Because it IS a religion of peace - to their own.
reply
1 up
Yeah, guess I just misunderstood what you were saying.
reply
1 up
High five SpursFanFromAround!
reply
4 ups
They said the planet. That’s where.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
PB2 gave the context when he said "on the planet."
reply
2 ups
You're right, I missed that.

However, I'm skeptical of his claim that white people "make up the smallest population on the planet".
reply
9 ups
This describes liberals and illegal immigrants
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/29zmjp.jpg (click to show) Why do we all seem to break down into groups instead of being the true melting pot? Part of the problem is the social justice groups putting wedges between traditions and their agenda.
reply
8 ups, 2 replies
Yeah. Like when black panther came out and there were people actually saying white people shouldn’t go see it. So let me get this straight. We should go to separate movie theaters? What about separate restaurants and bathrooms and water fountains next. Real progressive and inclusive guys.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Right, progressives re-segregated the military with Woodrow Wilson. He also showed "Birth of a Nation" which was a progressive KKK film in the white house. Too many examples to list about the racists progressives who are now using the groups they hated to push their agenda. Weird how that happened.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
You seem to be confusing Democrat with progressive. There's nothing "progressive" about the Klan. They are the exact opposite of socially progressive. The very term "progressive KKK" that you used sounds absurd, like "inclusive segregationist".
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
The democratic party is progressive, listen to Hillary describe herself as an early progressive follower which was Woodrow Wilson. Yes there are many progressive Republicans as well. The progressive party was about Eugenics which was taking off with the Fabian Society in Europe. Also a German leader took that and tried to purify his race by extermination of Jews, Gays, People of Faith, Criminals, Mentally challenged and other groups deemed defective. This was also what Margaret Sanger (founder of planned parenthood) studied while she was in Europe. She came back and started her organization in large cities where most people of color lived. So much to go over but these are the low lights of the progressive party followers in both parties.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
And you think people today who use the label "progressive" have that meaning in mind? Eugenics and genocide?
reply
4 ups
No, just like I do not have racism, homophobe or an islamaphobe on my mind. Just because I am a person of faith does not mean I have gays for not supporting "marriage" This is my point of all being treated as an individual instead lumped into a group as a democrat, republican, conservative or liberal. I consider myself as a conservative libertarian which means I do not care what you do, just do not force me to accept what you do. I do not hate others that do not believe the way I do but people like to attack and label those who do not believe there way. I seen some of your posts and do not agree with much you say but I do not hate you. I never met you or sat down and talked to you. I just wish others could stop being judgemental and even somewhat hateful. I like debating ideas like this without being personal. If you can or can't do that, that is up to you.
reply
0 ups
Yeah next they'll call for "black only safe places" at colleges
reply
10 ups, 2 replies
You literally got those words from (now dead) white supremacist David Lane. So in that context, yes, they are racist.
reply
10 ups, 3 replies
reply
4 ups
That made me spit out my beer LOL
reply
3 ups
Hahahaha
reply
2 ups
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
So everything a racist person says is automatically racist even if it's a true statement?

Racist: "Evacuate the building it's on fire!"
Octavia chocking on smoke: "No man, you're a racist."
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I never said that. If you read my comment, you will see that I said "so in that context..." because he was getting that exact quote from someone who actually was racist, and that quote had clearly racist intentions behind it.
reply
5 ups
so in context of this discussion you have chosen the one context in which it is racist.

black lives matter and it´s okay to be white are equally innocent until you put something behind it.

You insisting that it is racist proves the point of the meme.
reply
3 ups
They are all racist. But forget about it. We must secure the existence of our planet so that any futur is possible
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
I've never seen any people but white people say this.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Black people are saying this type of thing a lot today.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
no they're not. See? it's easy to say whatever you want as fact.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Yes they are. I hear them every time I watch the news.

See, just because your name is "anonymous" and you think it's clever, you're still an idiot who knows nothing.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
No...you don't. And your name is better? LOL...loser.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Yes, they do, idiot. Keep talking, douche, cause you're sounding more and more like an ignorant fool.

I know exactly what I hear them saying and no dumb liberal on the left is going to tell me what I have and haven't heard.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
LOL- you are silly. You don't see that at all. Tell you what ....find some clips from the NEWS shows you've seen this since you said you see it EVERY TIME YOU WATCH THE NEWS. It's not true and you know it. You just want to say you have seen this so you can feel better about being a racist. It's ok....but now you're a liar too.
reply
1 up, 2 replies
Keep talking, race baiter, is humorous.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Spurs, I don't know how you have the energy to keep responding to idiots like this guy. I respond now and then but can only take so much stupid. It's like you have superpowers and are resistant to the annoyances of the "progressives." I applaud you.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
No, I don't have superpowers. I got bit by a spider and a scorpion once, but never turned into a super human. lol! I was disappointed.
1 up
Those darn Marvel comics are always misleading people...
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
You know how you can tell I'm Christian and not Muslim?

I haven't threatened your life.
1 up
Find any of all those news clips from EVERY TIME YOU WATCH them?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
And your point?
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
That I have never seen anyone EXCEPT white people say:
"We must secure the existence of our people and a future for our children."

Take it for what it is.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
So you just reworded what you said and never explained the point of your comment? Are you saying there is no point to your comment? Maybe you just don't realize (or are afraid to admit) the thought behind your comment.

What if someone said, "I've never seen any people but black people <insert action>."
reply
2 ups
It is what it is. In this case... maybe nothing . Since it doesn't exist.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
The 14 words I 100% agree
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I dont want to nuke people but I wouldn't be sad if the middle East got flattened and turned to glass
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
ok. i support islam as much as you but "nuke mecca" and saying i don't want to nuke ppl. is clearly a contradiction. please correct me if i'm wrong.

personally i would prefer to convert all i could from islam to true christianity. just my .02
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I don't support their religion I support their rights to practice as long as it doesn't bother others as in forcing the public to join their religion making a lot of noise as in the call to pray making a double legal system and calling for murder with intent I can be friends with Muslims I would not agree with most of what they say
reply
1 up, 1 reply
ok so just to be clear you don't want to "nuke mecca" even though your name is "nuke mecca" is that correct?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I like to annoy people with my name bad choice on my part I would consider myself to be a Liberal in the economic religious and personal there are somethings I highly disagree with like I am pro life I think abortion is only OK when the mother or child's life is danger I am against forcing a priest to perform a gay wedding and forcing a company to serve a customer they don't want to i dont want to make a list of my beliefs if you want to I could share my 8 values and political compass
reply
1 up
you can post whatever you like i promise to read it and give you an upvote. hopefully you'll do the same. ;-) I respect your views and your right to free speech. you seem like a reasonable person. (helpful hint) your posts would be easier to follow with a period after each sentence. (not trying to be a jerk or anything) have a nice day. :-)
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
No he means he would be happy if a few million people were murdered as long as he didn't have to do it himself because he is an immature little f*ggot who thinks he is cute and clever.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
No "I wouldn't be sad" is what I said not I would be happy big difference
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Yes, you are sad.
reply
0 ups
What do you mean by that
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
which one offends you? anyone else notice how the are almost the same? one is a fist one is an open hand. I should make one with 2.5 fingers out, then everyone is confused, and offended.
reply
0 ups
Neither "offends" me personally. Top One supports genocide and oppression and the other is a symbol of solidarity of all for equal rights.
reply
2 ups
Agreed and upvote!
Flip Settings

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

Show embed codes
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 3
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
= OKAY; WE MUST SECURE THE EXISTENCE OF OUR PEOPLE AND A FUTURE FOR BLACK CHILDREN. WE MUST SECURE THE EXISTENCE OF OUR PEOPLE AND A FUTURE FOR LATINO CHILDREN. = OKAY; WE MUST SECURE THE EXISTENCE OF OUR PEOPLE AND A FUTURE FOR ASIAN CHILDREN. = OKAY; WE MUST SECURE THE EXISTENCE OF OUR PEOPLE AND A FUTURE FOR WHITE CHILDREN. = RACIST
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back
Feedback