Imgflip Logo Icon

Creepy Condescending Wonka

Creepy Condescending Wonka Meme | SO MR. DEMOCRATIC PARTY POLITICIAN, YOU SAY THAT NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW... SO DOES THAT ALSO INCLUDE THE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS IN THIS COUNTRY YOUR PARTY WORKS TO PROTECT? | image tagged in creepy condescending wonka,democratic party,democrats,illegal immigration,illegal aliens,sanctuary cities | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
10,881 views 116 upvotes Made by anonymous 6 years ago in fun
Creepy Condescending Wonka memeCaption this Meme
95 Comments
[deleted]
14 ups, 6y
Dr Evil Laser Meme | NO JUAN IS ABOVE THE LAW | image tagged in memes,dr evil laser | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
7 ups, 6y
Black Girl Wat Meme | WHAT THE F**K IS THIS MEME? AND WHY IS IT ON THE FRONT PAGE? | image tagged in memes,black girl wat | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3 ups, 6y,
1 reply
Better life in America! Something they can have, that you don't!
[deleted]
1 up, 6y
Futurama Fry Meme | AND AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE TOO | image tagged in memes,futurama fry | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4 ups, 6y,
1 reply
3 ups, 6y,
4 replies
We're talking some straight up projection, because like George W, Reagan openely stated that his purpose was a crass attempt to create instant new grateful Republicans.
What they failed to realize, people get to pick party affiliations, they're not annointed with them.

Perhaps if Republicans looked at people - including they're own minions - as people, and not extruded drones, they wouldn't be hemorrhaging members away as they have been.
4 ups, 6y,
3 replies
3 ups, 6y,
3 replies
We shall see...
0 ups, 6y
Wishful thinking at it's finest
2 ups, 6y,
1 reply
2 ups, 6y,
3 replies
1 up, 6y
1 up, 6y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 6y,
1 reply
1 up, 6y
It was Russia. No, it was Comey. No, its was republicans. No, it was climate change. No, it was immigration policy. No, it was cow farts. No, it was racism. No, it was that Mexican who was smuggled into the country in the gas tank of a '76 Datsun. No, it was anal leakage. They have a lot of drums!
[deleted]
1 up, 6y
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
Hopefully.

Like when people would say Trump hadn't a chance in 2016, I told them, "I got one word for ya: George W Bush, TWICE!"

Now that word is "Donald J Trump"
2 ups, 6y,
5 replies
Apparently that's the only way a Republican can win POTUS these days...
[deleted]
3 ups, 6y,
1 reply
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
Not all Republicans are owned by Putin.
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
1 up, 6y
Is he one of the Koch brothers?

They're ALL owned, dingbat. Both those parties are corporate machines funded by the SAME people, which is why 98% of what they vote for is in AGREEMENT.

Schumer, DACA, Gov't Shutdown? He had the Repubs by the balls, then suddenly gave in, never raising the issue again. Does your that not register slightly odd in that hollow cranium of yours?
0 ups, 6y
[deleted]
1 up, 6y,
1 reply
1 up, 6y
Taking it you were blissfully unaware of the DNC rigging the election against Bernie Sanders... if so never, ever vote again.
0 ups, 6y,
3 replies
2 ups, 6y,
1 reply
Duly elected per our Constitution, thank you.
0 ups, 6y,
3 replies
elected as per Russian collusion/interference*
1 up, 6y,
2 replies
How do? More illegal aliens than ever are voting in our elections, so how can you prove this when the investigation concluded that it didn't happen?
1 up, 6y
https://cis.org/Cadman/Chicago-Dilutes-Right-Vote-Designating-Illegal-Alien-ID-Card-Registration-Document
0 ups, 6y
Um, wot?

Illegal aliens can't vote.

Investigation is going on NOW.
Mueller report, comin atcha in May. Enjoy.
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
Henoff, you claim that you are not a Democrat, but you spew all of their same debunked talking points.
0 ups, 6y
It's kinda sad and yet rather telling that you must assume that all those who stated basic facts must be Democrats while your alts and fellow bots echo the same catch phrases totally devoid of info.

"Liberal" & "Snowflake" & "Dems" are basic unimaginative ad hominems. They are not counter points.
[deleted]
1 up, 6y,
1 reply
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
Remind me again who it was that approved selling our uranium to the Russians? Was that Trump, or Hillary?

And which one of them received a huge donation to their foundation shortly thereafter?

You are an idiot if you seriously think after more than a year of investigation and NO EVIDENCE of any Russian collusion... there is Russian collusion by anyone but Hillary, et al.
0 ups, 6y
Neither, look it up if you really don't know?

- Wait, you don't mean Trump Jr & Kushner?
And Trump Sr & Co isn't being investigated for it, you flagrant imbecile? k
1 up, 6y,
1 reply
0 ups, 6y
Oh wow, you really insulted the lib crowd.

I'll give them call and let them know you hurt their feelz.
0 ups, 6y
1 up, 6y,
1 reply
Then of course, there's citizen members of the party whose decline in numbers over the decades necessitated said gerrymandering in the first place.
[deleted]
1 up, 6y,
1 reply
Actually your Democratic Party has been losing numbers as well https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)
Look at the membership numbers, it has a red down arrow on it. Both parties have been bleeding numbers for awhile now.
1 up, 6y
MY Demo wha? Sorry, pal, I'm not in any of your cute lil' monkey see/do klubz

Look below, already posted it.

And sadly for you horseshoe bandwagoners, there ARE more than YOUR two practically identical corrupt bullshit parties in the USA still, tho you drones have marginalized them into almost nothing.
3 ups, 6y,
1 reply
Are you mental or just acting like you are stupid?
1 up, 6y
Yes, I am.
[deleted]
1 up, 6y,
2 replies
Reagan was wrong. He made a deal with Democrats for better border security. It just led to the mess we have today.
0 ups, 6y
Bullshit. Read book.
[deleted]
1 up, 6y,
1 reply
I am getting sick and tired of people bringing up Reagan whenever illegal immigration is brought up. Nobody has ever said what he did was right. He was hoping to get increased border security out of the deal and and an e-verify type program out of the deal. He did for awhile, but eventually the Democrats took over everything and started ignoring the laws. And with amnesty it led to a lot of chain migration as well. Which is why this President won’t make any deals without doing something about chain migration and a lot of other things. Quite frankly I don’t want any deals that involve things like DACA unless stricter rules are put into place. Any sort of DACA type bill should have very strict conditions put into place. Only allowing the very best and brightest of them who truly want to help all of America. It should also not involve anyone brought here over the age of 10. By age 10 you are pretty aware of things and you would certainly remember sneaking into another country.
1 up, 6y,
1 reply
e-verify? In the 1980s?

Reagan openly stated it was to garner future Repubs.

The Dems didn't ignore the laws, just passed them. In fact, what YOU'RE supposed to say is that they "forced him to support it."

Law enforcement, as usual, made a big show at first then went lax, as per usual.
The economy was improving, thus demonization of job stealing Mexis faded as those cherries needed picking so you can get fat cheaply and spit the pits at them.
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
0 ups, 6y
Of course they do *pats head*

Shits boring, thread's dead, since you're getting desperate for comebacks, don't forget to mention Hillarat's Benghazi emails about the pizza delivery ring.

Later, tootz.
1 up, 6y,
1 reply
So where's your proof that the Republican party is "hemoraging members"?
By the way, both party's view people, especially their own minions, as extruded drones. That is a problem in modern politics in general and is not unique to either party.
2 ups, 6y,
3 replies
You really don't know this?

Not only gerrymandering, but the desperate cries to maintain the outmoded Electoral College in order to give their peripheral votes more weight?

It's not unique to any party, as it's not unique to any religion (or any other such body of belonging) which they not only in effect emulate, they have replaced in terms of affiliation, identification, and congregation.
[deleted]
1 up, 6y,
2 replies
I'm surprised to see that the democrats are actually gaining back members.That'll change by 2020 because they'll keep pushing for neo-liberal candidates (GOP lite) The party leaders don't want to serve the party members, just the corporate sponsors that provoked them to push for Hillary in 2016. It will never have as many registered members as it did in 1976, after Nixon resigned and a Southern Baptist brought back the southern Democrats for that election.Still, more people are fleeing the parties, BOTH parties, because they no longer represent John Q. Public, but rather the corporate interests. That's why the number of Independents has grown so much in the last few decades.Trump was elected because of those indies not wanting Hillary. The DNC chose to back a losing candidate thinking they could flip Independents over to their side. The only reasons I could get on why to vote for Hillary is "that it's time we had a woman president" and "She's not Trump" While females are in the majority of the US population (50.8% women. 49.2% men per US Census Bureau) that was not enough in the key states to put her over Trump.

The DNC has not learned from history.They have been putting up neo-liberals for the last 40 years, and forget that their power play against the GOP was their progressive stance.
1 up, 6y
INot to sound too cynical or snooty, but I think you give people too much credit. Sure, some think in those ways, but the average voter has no clue further than their percieved illusion of how the economy benefits their wallet at the present time.
Like the recession. One day folks are redoing their kitchens every cpl of yrs and buying and flipping houses all gushy at the ever-climbing prices, the next they realized their credit cards were long past maxed out, and the money they never had to begin with suddenly went MIA.

The notion of being progressive has been demonized, and that and liberal are used derisively with those with such leanings thus retreating from being viewed as such. People have been going more grassroots on progressive issues knowing their representatives will only go along just in time for the photo op once the deal is almost sealed.

Agreed about Hillary, but she was also touted as the experienced connected insider who still cared for the regular folks, even as she took the vote of various segments for granted and was percieved as unabashadly phony to them. The Bill/Hill image banked on his popularity and nostalgia for that era. They interpreted negative views on her not being him and the corruption they were associated with (plus ill will towards Bill as President, etc) as merely the charges of her opposition rather than the disillusioned views of the Democrat base.

Trump basically rode celebrity status and a knack for yapping what those feeling sidelined by a changing world stripping them of the status they thought they used to have felt. The economy not screaming at the consumer level, his business prowess postering propelled him as savior, while his demonization of Obama made him into a vengeful Messiah for the crass masses.

Big business at the helm has been resigned to, people hoping they'll be carried forward in the wake. The days of movements and marches and riots that were more than soon-to-be-passing social media fads have been consigned to memories of two generations ago. People are too busy taking selfies with their Ventis to post on Facebook. Any further exertions might interfere with this weekend's Netflix binge....

Bear in mind, the amount of voters voting is also gradually dwindling. The idiot Hillary camp bousted of a sure win so much that many voters didn't bother voting. Conversly, efforts to stymie the reelection of Obama got people out more in defiance.
1 up, 6y,
1 reply
btw,. much of what I said was pretty much as addition, not contradiction, to what you said.
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y
We're pretty close on perception, that's true. Right now we've got a businessman running for US Rep seat currently held by Wacky Jackie. Also in the primary is a lawyer and a single issue candidate that just wants marijuana laws repealed. Looking at their experience in public service, I'd have to go for the lawyer. How well he'd do, I'm not certain, but the businessman and him are about the same on the issues. The third, won't even make those issues a part of his platform, which will cost him dearly. The key to upcoming elections is going to expand the ACA to a "Medicare for all" program. That, in and of itself, is closer to what's needed, but there are other issues involved that need to be taken care of. The Electoral College dissolution is something that's needed, but won't happen because, without it, the right wing would have trouble ever getting the executive branch again.
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y
Yey, I don’t recall ever saying that Republicans don’t have their little “ways” of getting votes as well, but playing with our national security for votes (like the is Democrats do) is very dangerous.

And there has been plenty of gerrymandering commited by the Democrats as well. Just like at self proclaimed illegal immigrant representative, Luis Gutierrez’s district in Illinois for example.

And like someone else has pointed out, both parties have been bleeding numbers for awhile. I don’t agree with Republicans on everything (I actually agree with Democrats
on some important issues) but as long as Democrats keep putting illegals ahead of Americans and continues pushing Increasingly Marxist ideas on America, I am forced to stay put where I am.
[deleted]
0 ups, 6y,
1 reply
http://ballot-access.org/2017/09/03/august-2017-ballot-access-news-print-edition/

"MINOR PARTIES GAIN REGISTRATIONS DURING 2017, BUT DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS, AND INDEPENDENTS DECLINE

During 2017, the number of voters registered as Democrats declined; the number of Republicans declined; the number of independents declined. But the number of voters registered into minor parties increased. See page four for a state-by-state breakdown. The data includes the 31 states in which the voter registration form asks the applicant to choose a party (or to choose independent status). The data also includes the District of Columbia. Obviously there can be no registration data from the other 19 states, because in those other 19 states, there is no such thing as a registered member of a political party.

It is normal for the number of registered voters to decline in odd years, because states cull their voter registration lists after election years. When this article discusses changes, it is comparing current data to the November 2016 data. All of the 2017 data is as of June or July, with these exceptions: the California data is from February 2017; the Pennsylvania data is from April 2017; the Florida minor party data is from November 2016; the Connecticut data is from November 2016; and the Massachusetts data for the unqualified parties is from November 2016. The Secretaries of State of Connecticut and Florida say they are hoping to be able to furnish complete registration data for all parties, on demand, in the future, but currently they cannot do that. Current Connecticut data can only be obtained by contacting each town clerk, and I didn’t do that work.

Libertarian registration is now higher than it has ever been. Although Green Party and Constitution Party registration increased between November 2016 and mid-2017, in the past those parties had higher registration totals than they do now."
1 up, 6y
^ tl;dr

LOOK at the meme you're replying to, you silly cud chewing oaf.
Show More Comments
Creepy Condescending Wonka memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
SO MR. DEMOCRATIC PARTY POLITICIAN, YOU SAY THAT NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW... SO DOES THAT ALSO INCLUDE THE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS IN THIS COUNTRY YOUR PARTY WORKS TO PROTECT?