And not to mention he's a punk kid with a foul mouth who has no respect for anyone who disagrees with him and his vast knowledge

And not to mention he's a punk kid with a foul mouth who has no respect for anyone who disagrees with him and his vast knowledge | ATTENDS A SCHOOL WHERE A MASS SHOOTING TAKES PLACE WHICH SUDDENLY MAKES HIM QUALIFIED TO SPEAK ABOUT GUN CONTROL | image tagged in david hogg,gun control,second amendment,childish | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
share
1,408 views, 36 upvotes, Made by SpursFanFromAround 9 months ago david hogggun controlsecond amendmentchildish
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
I SEE A LOT OF ME IN THAT KID | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Wish I could give you a hundred upvotes for that...
reply
0 ups
:) The first time I saw ol Tony do interview I thought "man that's the biggest ahole ever". Then as another meme pointed out earlier, this kid comes along and says "hold my beer".
reply
2 ups
Leonardo Dicaprio Cheers Meme | GIVE THE MAN A TIDEPOD | image tagged in memes,leonardo dicaprio cheers | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
1 up
There's sumthin', ah say, there's sumthin' off 'bout that boy! | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
How is a 17-year-old so polished, glib and at ease in front of a camera? And where are his parents? Has anybody ever seen them? There are things that just don't add up.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Leonardo Dicaprio Cheers Meme | LIKE PEOPLE WHO BECOME CHRISTIANS THEN FEEL QUALIFIED TO SPEAK ABOUT...EVERYTHING | image tagged in memes,leonardo dicaprio cheers | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Christians speak about the word of God. If they study the Bible and pray, they are qualified to speak as God has commanded them to. Although, I don't speak about it nearly as much as I should, believe it or not.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
I know Christians who believe that being Christian and reading the Bible makes them totally qualified to speak about:

human rights
politics
economics
geology
climatology
astronomy
biology
morality
epistemology
other religions
etc etc
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I think it's more of their thought about God says it and so they echo what the Bible tells them. This is me, qnyway. I can't speak for all Christians, or people who say they are Christians.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Do you think that simply repeating what other people have already said is a good way to develop critical thinking and reasoning skills?
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
When it comes to repeating what God says, most certainly.
reply
1 up
How does that develop critical thinking skills? You're literally just repeating what the Bible says, not giving your own thoughts.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Eeeeevolution. ;P
reply
1 up
;D
reply
2 ups
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
Proof?
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Pretty sure this is humorous sarcasm based on the idea of crisis actors.
reply
1 up, 2 replies
reply
2 ups, 3 replies
YEP! I remember that. Also, how many times have we seen "witness" interviews in the immediate aftermath where the "traumatized witness" was smiling and relaxed after what ever "event". If I were traumatized from a shooting situation I don't think I would be relaxed and smiling.
reply
1 up
reply
1 up, 1 reply
People react to things differently. I've seen people laugh at funerals when a funny memory is recalled or a funny story is told. Just because someone seems relaxed doesn't mean they are an actor. Besides, if they really were an actor, wouldn't they be acting sad?

You seem to be wanting to have it both ways: they are actors, pretending to have just survived a tragic ordeal, yet they aren't acting like someone who has just survived a tragic ordeal? Which is it?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I don't know how you think anyone is expecting to have it both ways. That paragraph makes no sense. Is it crazy to expect paid actors to try to be more convincing? Just saying. Also, Laughing at a funeral when a funny joke is made is social conversation is a far cry from obvious poor acting. I have laughed at many a funeral while recalling fun times with the now deceased. Genuine and appropriate affect.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
You say they are paid actors yet you say they aren't good actors. If they are such lousy actors, why would they have been hired in the first place?

This is (according to the idea) supposed to be a real event where people actually died, so why would the government (or whoever) hire second-rate actors to try and convince the public that it's all real?
1 up
Are you saying that ALL paid actors are good actors? You can get paid for anything a be terrible at it. This is a fact. Why would second rate actors be hired? Because they aren't easily recognizable, that's why. Have you ever seen the website where these crisis actors advertise their services, and have you never seen the actual ads they put on Craig's List for them also? A lot of people have never seen either of those, yet there they are in plain sight. The way they can get away with all of this is that first, the media is certainly not going to report it to the public, second of all, most people won't believe it even with proof.

All that being said It is not my goal to convince you. Originally I was simply commenting on what someone else posted.I also don't blame you for questioning what we discuss here. I don't take anything to be factual info unless I have reason to believe it to be actually true, because nothing is ever what it seems. There are those who are on a mission to deceive for whatever reason. I keep my eyes open for that always.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Not all actors are good actors. But if you're hiring actors to convince millions of people of something, I'm sure you would hire the best actors available. The "so they aren't easily recognizable" argument doesn't make sense, because there are literally hundreds, if not thousands, of actors who are very good actors, yet who aren't publicly recognizable.

Also, if these people are paid actors pretending to be victims of an actual tragedy, why would they advertise on websites? When they are seen alive later on, and their website or ad is discovered, the entire thing conspiracy would unravel immediately.

You say you "don't take anything to be factual info unless (you) have reason to believe it to be actually true", yet you seem to believe the incredibly more unlikely scenario than the incredibly likely one (massive government conspiracy, coverup and false flag operation versus a crazy person attacking people because they're crazy).

"nothing is ever what it seems"

Many times, things are exactly what they seem.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Nothing makes sense. The timing of these supposed events, the way they get reported then suddenly fall off the radar, the supposed crusaders that get massive media attention. Etc. Very little makes sense. That being said, you are quite entitled to what you believe as am I.
reply
1 up
What do you mean the timing? Are tragedies supposed to occur only during certain times?
reply
1 up, 2 replies
That makes no sense at all. If someone was "reported" killed at Sandy Hook but actually wasn't, why would they be brought out in front of cameras later on? That is incredibly asinine. You're saying the government developed this elaborate conspiracy to fake their death, then bring them out for all the public to see?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
The Sandy Hook school and the home of the Shooter Adam Lanza were both demolished, shortly after the incident. The school was literally melted down. The house the shooter lived in was mysteriously transferred to the town. A bank also seized it (probably because no one was paying the mortgage after Lanza’s mother was killed). The bank burned all of the carpets and personal property in the house before the town demolished it. The bank sold the house to the town for a massive loss by accepting a single dollar for it. None of these facts are normal. Why would any of these strange things happen? If these things didn’t happen it wouldn’t have all the trappings of a hoax. Most of the pictures of the house and Lanza look like bad fake photoshop creations.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I don't know the procedure in cases like that, but it doesn't sound far-fetched. If the homeowner was killed, the bank could sell the house. Because of the notoriety of who lived there, they probably didn't want to try to sell it to anyone else. So they sold it to the town, who then demolished it. Another reason to demolish it is they probably didn't people coming from all over to look at or possibly vandalize or ransack the house. It's nowhere near as unusual as you're making it out to be.

It's like during the Boston Marathon bombing, when people were talking about a photograph of a guy on a nearby roof. "Oh my god, who is this guy?! What's he doing up there?! He looks so suspicious! He's probably in on the conspiracy!!" I was like "umm...it looks like a guy watching, oh I don't know, the marathon!"

These ideas I hear people pass around as "proof" of a conspiracy or false flag operation are so often complete garbage and drivel.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Maybe, but it doesn’t matter how you look at it, if there wasn’t a hoax, then it was a cover up. This whole “we’re not going to tell you why it happened because the shooter doesn’t deserve to have his story told” mentality that started under Obama increased the number of mass shootings. Because those are code words for we are covering for the people responsible.
1 up
That's a very large and unsubstantiated leap to conclusions. It's also a non sequitur. You're claiming that "not telling the shooters' stories" directly increased the number of mass shootings? What proof do you have? What proof do you have that it's "code words" for covering for the people responsible?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Because it would be so unbelievable if true that no one would believe it anyway. Sandy Hook was a hoax.
reply
1 up, 5 replies
Okay, so if something tragic happens to you, I get to say it's all a hoax, and you're in on the hoax.
reply
1 up
The policy, as stated, over and over and over, since 2008 is we are not going to report why this happened. And the media and government have not reported why. If you remember columbine, there were videos of the shooters. Their notebooks. Their reasons. EVERYTHING. That was the last one. Whether you believe it or not, as soon as the openly stated policy was we will not disclose why, all of these types of events exploded in to drastic increases in how often they occur. Not a few more. 6 times more. Or 600% more. It’s the same thing with police shootings. Unarmed white people are no less than 1000% more likely to be killed by police than they were before Obama took office. How many news stories about why unarmed white people being shot by police are there? None. Once you conceal the cause, you make it happen more by pretending the cause doesn’t exist. It’s not politics. Both parties are doing this. It’s concealment. And it is causing more of these events. Not less.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
No but if a hoax happens and it is supposed to be about something tragic enough to affect a whole nation, then why would so much of it be so hidden? They destroyed the school? They destroyed the shooters house? He had no surviving relative or anyone who actually knew him or his mother? He was well known in the community, but no one knew him? Its like a joke. The story sounds made up. The things that happened after it don't make any sense. Theres enough evidence that it really was a hoax.
2 ups
What do you mean they destroyed the school and his house?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
The proof is that these concealeatory policies of pretending they’re taking the high road instead of explaining what went wrong have increased mass shootings, the shooting of unarmed people by the police and shootings of police by people. It’s about 200% more likely for a cop to get killed at work, people are 450% more likely to get shot by the police (about 1000% more likely when unarmed) and there are over 600% more mass shootings since 2008. These are from the federal government’s own numbers. The fake news just never reports these facts. The first step at correcting the problem is disclosing the facts, seeing why it happened and correcting or eliminating that cause. Hiding the cause across the board since 2008 has been, literally, a holocaust of thousands upon thousands of deaths that could have been prevented.
0 ups
You haven't explained how the increase in mass shootings is directly tied to how the government and media report on them
reply
1 up
If it’s as if I never existed afterwards. All my memes never existed. My house gets demolished and then I have dinner with the president and am pictured in the news with him in our MAGA hats.....YES!
reply
1 up, 1 reply
It’s simple. And I did say why—by not reporting anything except how terrible it was for the victims—it becomes a devious concealed way to cover up what actually happened and why. So we get a terrible mass shooting that happened for some reason. But that reason is entirely concealed. The news will simply not report why it happened, just that a lot of people will be crying for a long time. By not reporting why the crazy person shot everyone up, it leaves everyone ignorant and then they repeat the behavior that caused the shooting. The chances that these nut jobs randomly kill everyone for no reason is BS. There was always some factor involving other people that cause it. This is always the case in almost every case. When people radicalize it is never random, there’s always a specific reason. The news and everyone else now conceals that reason. Back in the days of Tim McVeigh, when these things were very rare, we got the whole story. Now that we get no explanation as to why it happened it is and exponentially more common problem.
0 ups
I'm sorry, but this doesn't make any sense to me. Even if the government was concealing the motivations for these attacks (which I don't believe they are), that would not lead to more people committing them. That's absurd.

Sometimes the motives are not revealed to the public because authorities just don't know the motive.
reply
1 up
Flip Settings

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
ATTENDS A SCHOOL WHERE A MASS SHOOTING TAKES PLACE; WHICH SUDDENLY MAKES HIM QUALIFIED TO SPEAK ABOUT GUN CONTROL
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back
Feedback