X All The Y

ROFL

No kidding!

Spreading the love of Jesus by calling people f*gs :D

It's pretty scumy. 'F*gs' may not be the right word, but all the people who commented how awful the Christian baker was and haven't said a word here are definitely something special.

Were you hoping this would trigger someone? It's an obvious response to the other meme. All the arguing has already started to die out in the comments over there. I think the subject has been debated pretty thoroughly already :)))

No response needed. I think the silence speaks for itself :)))))

Honestly I think it's hilarious that you're expecting any kind of response to this meme other than what you're getting. It's just a silly meme.

Not looking for a response. Just cuz you keep talking about the response I supposedly want doesn't mean I was ever looking for one.

Not just a silly meme though. It presents quite the debacle for a sjw hell bent on being politically correct.

If you want to give a response, how about you adress the conundrum presented by this meme. If the Christian baker had been Islamic instead, do you think the government should require him to bake the cake?

No I don't. And I don't see the homophobic baker being forced to make anyone a cake either. Nor should he if he doesn't want to. But it's bad for business and one judge found that he violated anti-discrimination laws in his state. The Supreme Court might overturn that. Personally I think he's a sacreligious d*ck. And I don't think he should hide behind his religion as an excuse to be a bigot.

Fair enough. You nailed it when you said "he shouldn't if he doesn't want to."

Unlike Christianity, there is no love thy neighbor stuff in Islam. According to their religion the gay men should be physically punished or killed. Is it still sacrilegious of the Islamic baker to deny the cake to the homosexuals? Would he be a dick since he's adhering to his religion? If so wouldn't that mean Islam is a religion of dicks?

They make their women cover up and walk behind them so yes... It is a religion of d*cks.

Hey Grind. Do not mind Octavia_Melody, she/he contradicts himself/herself all the time. Pay no attention.

Evidence? Screenshots? Where is your proof that I contradict myself?

If you allow me to ask you a series of 4 simple questions by answering them I can prove you contradict yourself. Do you want to go?

Okay

"But it's bad for business" it is his business, his choice. Who are you to judge? "Personally I think he's a sacreligious d*ck. And I don't think he should hide behind his religion as an excuse to be a bigot." judge judge judge, how are you even different?

I'd still make him a cake, though, even if I disagreed with his ideals...

I'm not using Jesus as some excuse to deny a service because I'm prejudiced. I'm not getting sued for shaming someone for their lifestyle choices and trying to make them feel like less of a human being. That's three huge differences between me and this douche.

That is your choice. Are you judging people for making different choices than yours? Again, how does that makes you different? Do you need to give me another example or are you getting the picture?

Hypocritical? Sure, I'll give you that.

You only know the mainstream Jesus. I know him and the one who flips tables and chases people around with whips.

Jesus smash sinners!

You can be whatever you want to be ????

Meanwhile there's a pedophile running for Congress and *that's* ok though...

He was only accused and it happened 40 years ago so there is no evidence to prove the accusation or disprove it. How convenient for the democrats that made the accusation.

MauiOnion is a pedophile. Now he's as guilty as you are of being a pedophile. You really do like to judge people, don't you?

I'm going to refrain from allowing you to turn this discussion around to me personally. Expecting people to be tolerant of intolerance is utter bullsh*t.

You missed the point. Because it happened 40 years ago it's unprovable. The democrats took advantage of the fact that people like you presume guilt when they hear an accusation.

Here are some facts:
The alleged incident occurred 40 years ago.
The accusations occurred recently.
Roy Moore was never convicted of any sexual misconduct.
There is no way to prove the accusations are true or false.

You sir, are a sucker for democrat propaganda and you're very judgmental. Use your brain to think, not you emotions.

Clinton stuck a cigar in Monica's yay yay. There's video evidence, but I guess you didn't know that.

I don't think him lying about it was grounds for impeachment and the court he was tried under shared the same opinion.

Lmao there was no video evidence of him doing that. Monica testified that she wanted to have sex but they used the cigar instead. And he didn't sexually assault her. She was a willing participant. He just denied fooling around with her and they got him for lying to Congress.

Maybe you're right about the video evidence. I coulda sworn that as a kid in the 90's I remember seeing some black and white footage of them on a bed on the news. They were both fully clothed. If it happened in the white house, you can bet it was recorded though. Every room in that place has had a camera in it for as long as that's been possible. The SS's top priority in the white house was probably keeping Bills promiscuity hidden from Hillary.

I didn't say anything about him sexually assaulting her. Like I said, lying about something like that isn't grounds for impeachment, even if it was to congress. I think the Republicans opened up a nasty can of worms trying to get him impeached over that. The Democrats have adopted the tactic and taken it to a whole nother level. They've figured out that all you have to do is cry "Pedophile!" before an election and people will believe them, no evidence required.

It would also reveal that muslims tend to be far more homophobic than people even realize. How would the SJW's react when they find that out about their friends?

The same way they react to Gangsta Rapper mysogeny, homophobia, racism, and violence advocacy - by excusing it as an aspect of what SJWs consider to be a less developed and a more backwards culture not to be faulted, like retarded children who can't know any better.

Ironically, by appointing themselves as the speakers for those they defend, SJWs prove themselves to be the real racists, because no one nominated them as defender, and no one said their charges aren't capable of defending themselves.

Lumping ALL their adopted charges as one innocent homogeneous mass instead of looking at them as separate groups and individuals further displays the bogus stereotyping of their forced altruism.

...ffffffffffffffffffffffffffleebs?

Dude stfu about that already. Nobody is waiting for anything. So far the only two people that don't like what this meme had to say that actually commented here have made personal attacks against other posters and have dodged the issue. At least the Octavia was able to admit it's hypocritical. You're just being a troll.

And that's actually what tons of people do on imgflip, so gfys.

Oh please. I'm just commenting like everyone else. Sorry if you don't like what I'm saying. I don't agree that the fact no one is commenting its hypocritical. Maybe the meme isn't worth arguing over. The other one is about a controversial Supreme Court case. This is just BS and you all are sitting around waiting for people to get baited then you're complaining when they're not. Maybe you're the real trolls in this scenario.

Seems like you got baited pretty well. But that's no surprise, I can't see a political meme without MauiOnion hopping in to spread his banal message of "ur a beeeegooot!" You're pretty much a broken record. Do you have anything to say other than accusing people of discrimination and trying to act like you always have the moral high ground? The stupidity never ceases to amuse. Thank you.

Meh, I couldn't care less about your inaccurate thoughts about my posting habits...